I suppose I really should mention...
Jul. 28th, 2009 10:38 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tcpip... that I suggested to ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
caseopaya that we get a civil union in accordance with Victorian law.
She said yes.
(I "blame", in part,airiefairie's excellent proposal for ending state-sanctioned marriage in favour of civil unions for all, and beagl and kimeros for cutting a similar path. Thanks for the inspiration.)
caseopaya that we get a civil union in accordance with Victorian law.She said yes.
(I "blame", in part,
airiefairie's excellent proposal for ending state-sanctioned marriage in favour of civil unions for all, and beagl and kimeros for cutting a similar path. Thanks for the inspiration.)![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-08-01 03:29 am (UTC)I was simply curious because it conflicted with the information we'd recently been given by accountants, estate lawyers and the like. I like to know when the information I'm basing my decisions on might be out-of-date.
Though when you respond to the (granted, smiley-faced and presumably less than serious) question "Do you have to get civilly united?" by giving only it as a reason, I trust you can see why one might think that it could be a significant consideration, if not the significant consideration? *smile*