tcpip: (Default)
Because I like to plan things in advance (it provides more opportunities for spontaneity), in six months' time I will be presenting at the Existentialist Society on "The Decline in French Philosophy" (April 4, 2026). There can be no doubt of my long-standing Francophile tendencies when it comes to the fine arts, cuisine, republican politics, and yes, especially French philosophy, at least from the Enlightenment to the Situationists. I admire the gentle spirit of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the grand knowledge and scope of Denis Diderot, and the courage of the entire body of "les philosophes" who took on the absolutism of the monarchy, the dead hand of the church and helped establish the modern public sphere through salon gatherings that, scandously, were hosted by women patrons, "les salonnières"!

Fast-forward to the twentieth century, and again I find myself delving deeply into the mathematics and physics of Henri Poincaré, the perceptual phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, which would add to the hermeneutics of Paul Ricoeur. I have all the time in the world for the incredible contributions to feminism by Simone de Beauvoir and consider her a better philosopher than her companion, Jean-Paul Sartre. Both, along with Albert Camus' ontological absurdism and the incredible personal standards of Simone Weil, raised and established existentialism a powerful force in the world of philosophy, demanding the primacy of existence over essence, authenticity in behaviour and thought, and recognition to the tension between people as objects and subjects.

These were all great thinkers in hard times. But subsequent to these contributions, things started to go astray. Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, and Félix Guattari's were all unable to incorporate their necessary criticisms of structuralism into subject disciplines. Jacques Derrida's would engage in intentional obfuscation through words with ambivalent meaning. Bruno Latour's social constructivism would end up becoming impossibly anti-scientific. Jean-François Lyotard retreated to the sublime, and Jean Baudrillard became obsessed with the interrelationship of signs and hypereality. Luce Irigaray asserted that E=mc^2 is a "sexed equation" and fluid mechanics is neglected in engineering because fluids are feminine.

It's not as if it's all bad; Foucault, Deleuze, and Guattari all highlighted abhorrent behaviours in abusive institutions. Derrida's deconstructionism is a useful method to highlight the unity of opposites. Latour does recognise the role of scientific language and practices. Lyotard and Baudrillard both hinted at what could have been a sociology of the information age, and Irigaray really does provide a political economy grounded in sexual difference. But so much of the content produced by post-WWII French philosophers is simply gibberish, ignorant, or both. This, of course, has been explored in the past as "fashionable nonsense", an evocative title by Sokal and Bricmont, who highlight the sort of gibberish that eventually led to the The Postmodern Essay generator, produced by a Melbourne-based computer scientist.

For what it's worth, I do appreciate the use of metaphors and puns; they're often not just witticisms, they can also provide some linguistic-therapeutic insight. But I do wonder whether the success of ordinary language philosophy on one hand and formal pragmatics on the other has led to a situation where much of French philosophy has become more of an art than something tied to logic, ontology, and epistemology. At least, in this context, Catherine Malabou is returning to reality with work on brain plasticity and François Recanati with conditional pragmatics. These are, at least, positive projects after decades of French philosophy providing content that was highly entertaining but ultimately superficial.
tcpip: (Default)
In the next few weeks, I will be speaking on two very different topics. The first on September 13, hosted by the Melbourne Agnostics Society, will be on "Stoicism, Taoism and Apathy", where I'll be wearing my hat as the University Outreach Officer for the International Society for Philosophers (yes, there is such a thing). I promise that the presentation may be quite different from what one might assume from the title! I am not giving too much away, however, in previewing that there is a great deal of similarity in what could be called the psychological versions of Stoicism and Taoism, although even this touches upon a common physics and even metaphysics that correlates with the two: the Logos and the Dao.

The second presentation is part of the "New Zealand Research Software Engineering Conference" on September 23-24. Despite my deep wish to have another excuse to return to the home country, this conference is being held entirely online. My presentation, with the truly riveting title "Programming Principles in a High Performance Computing Environment", will provide both an overview of the current postgraduate cohort's programming experience, their needs, and the relevant training courses that I conduct at the University of Melbourne, especially in relation to high performance and parallel code. It will dovetail quite well with recent workshops that I conducted last week on "Regular Expressions with Linux" and "GPGPU Programming", along with near-future workshops on "Mathematical Applications and Programming" and the ever-popular "High Performance and Parallel Python".

Finally, on a related note, many would have seen from photos on Facebook that I am giving away a number of academic and general books, spanning my rather diverse interests; about five hundread in total and a shared Google Drive folder has been created for those who wish to peruse, with more (especially from business studies and computer science) forthcoming. I suspect after this, the next giveaway will be from my fiction books and then from my rather vast music collection. All of this is in aid of finding happy homes for various useful things that I don't have a strong emotional attachment to, creating more space within my abode, and, ultimately, thinking of where I will live for the next chapter in my life. But that is in a couple of years at least; nobody has ever accused me of acting with only short-term in mind.
tcpip: (Default)
On Sunday I gave an address to the local Unitarian-Universalist Fellowship on "The Pursuit of Happiness" which followed the phrase from the US Declaration of Independence, and outlined the three main approaches; hedonistic, Epicurean, and Stoic along with some empirical backing from the modern science of well-being and societal-level measures. As I mentioned in the presentation, I have discusssed this matter at some length in the past with "The Continuum of Needs and Wants", to the Melbourne Agnostics, on November 14, 2020, "From Stoicism and Naturalistic Pantheism to Effective Altruism" to The Sea of Faith in Australia, on April 21st 2022, and "We Are We Do: Emotions, Trauma, and Happiness" the Melbourne Unitarian-Universalist Fellowship, on May 15, 2022. I neglected to mention, because I plain forgot, that I also gave a presentation to The Philosophy Forum on August 7, 2011, also entitled "The Pursuit of Happiness". Across all these presentations there is a running theme where I note that there are different stages of happiness that correlate with Hannah Arendt's categories of being and the satisfaction of each stage can lead to an indulgence which brings unhappiness - and the empirical evidence backs this up. Thus there is an evolution from sensual hedonism, to the contentment of Epicureanism, to the moral virtue and social engagement exemplified by the Stoics.

On the matter of hedonistic and epicurean approaches, the winter phase in Melbourne is an opportunity for me to engage in various forms of soups and stodgy fare of which various dining companions are given the opportunity to put on a kilo or two in my company. As promised in the last entry, I have a small mountain of recipes to update of this nature, so here's the new additions: Coq au vin, Vichyssoise, Soupe au Pistou, Hungarian Mushroom Soup and Langos, and Irish Colcannon. This last weekend also witnessed "German night" which is a challenge when you're cooking for vegetarians. Although in the past I have made Kaese Spaetzle (the German version of "mac and cheese"), this time I tried my hand at Eier in Senfsoße (eggs in mustard sauce) with a side of sauerkraut, Thuringian Klöße mit Bratkartofflen (potato dumplings and fried potatoes), with Schmorkohl (Braised Cabbage), and Frankfurter grie soβ (green sauce - mine was not nearly green enough), before finishing with a Schwarzwälder Kirschtorte (Blackforest Cake). Apart from the cake, there was a pretty serious amount of cabbage, potato, and onion and whilst it all wasn't bad at all, my friends of Rhineland-Palatinate and Baden-Württemberg regions may forgive my preferences of the more colourful foods of the Campagne française.
tcpip: (Default)
On Saturday I gave a lengthy presentation on the current state of artificial intelligence. There was a fair attendance, around forty or so people, and it provided the opportunity to review presentations I have given on the subject from several years past and more. I was able to discuss popular examples (DALL-E, ChatGPT) as well as delving into some philosophical issues regarding artificial consciousness. My general position, which still seems borne out by the facts, is that anything that can be automated will be automated and that higher-level consciousness is confronted with the qualia of understanding confirmed by the mutual generation of novel shared-symbolic values. Critics of AI who argue a perspective of subjective phenomenology is somehow special (almost like magic) to biological systems don't really have a strong argument and will find themselves confronted by the everyday reality of increasingly impressive advances in rules-based programmatic complexity. It was also rather nice to mention in passing how the promise of AI and automation could promise many opportunities for a life of leisure for the world's population, but our current political economy is suggesting instead mass under- and unemployment. Apparently, that is going to be a topic for a future presentation.

The topic dovetailed quite nicely to a work presentation that I chaired on Friday with David Wilkinson discussing applied ecology for conservation work on the Spartan supercomputer; several projects were provided with the effects of the 2019-20 Australian bushfires being the most dramatic. Further, the first week of my final paper for the Graduate Diploma in Psychology at Auckland University begins this week, Social Processes, which is social psychology under any other name. I am currently on the verge of finishing all the required readings for the unit and next week will make a start on the assignments. Why am I doing this? Because this is also the week when I begin my new degree, a Master's in Climate Change Science and Policy at Wellington University and realistically I should try to minimise the overlap between the two. The add another component to the lectern, albeit on the other side, I have also received the timetable for when I'll be providing my annual role as lecturer and tutor for the UniMelb course Cluster and Cloud Computing. It is going to be a very busy and challenging month for my brain, even more so than usual. Just as well my love of learning is a life purpose.
tcpip: (Default)
It is a curious thing, that in the week that I have written an extensive essay on how the new user interface of Duolingo will probably damage the company and is sufficiently bad that I have cancelled my paid subscription of many years, that I should end up on top of the Diamond League for the week. But then again, that does display how extensively I have been a user. Following a bit of investigation I have discovered - not to my surprise - that there are some reasonably good free-and-open-source software solutions, the most attractive seems to be the media-rich Anki flashcards, built on the principle of spaced repetition, but with user-created content (including your own). I can see why it has received such positive recommendations on various language-learning forums.

There have been a few political engagements in the past week as well, this time being an essay for the Isocracy Network, "The Failure of Putin's Gamble", which basically says what is stated on the title; Putin thought that Ukraine would be easy to defeat and it wasn't. Ultimately I keep returning to the article I wrote in 2014; let the oblasti in question themselves determine what country they would prefer to live under. On a much more local scale, I must mention that I also attended a local candidates forum for the State election, where both candidates and voters did not surprise in either the questions or answers.

The last item being noted here is that I've discovered that the philosopher Geoffrey Klempner has died. He is not the sort of philosopher that has left a magnum opus in terms of philosophical insight, but rather his great strength was opening up the discipline through the journal "Philosophical Pathways" and establishing the International Society for Philosophers, of which I am the University Outreach officer. I do have some concerns on the future of the organisation now that Geoffrey has gone as he really was the main driver, despite an extensive supporting board.
tcpip: (Default)
I have been giving some thought to the pursuit of happiness in recent days, that very famous line from the United States Declaration of Independence (and a rather overlooked and brilliant analysis by Hannah Arendt), and it was an item of discussion over dinner last night with Nitul D and, in a different form, with my dear old friend Lauren R over lunch today. It is a matter of fact that people say they seek what makes them happy in life, but find themselves stuck on a hedonic treadmill and actually find themselves empty and unhappy as a result. The problem is that hedonism, engaging in pleasurable activities, is an ineffective path to lasting happiness. By hedonism, one can mean everything from various versions of sportsball, games, the purchase of possessions, and other similar distractions. It must be emphasised that there is nothing wrong with engaging in such light pleasures in small levels; I like to break up the day for a few minutes pretending I'm a little mouse that drives a hovercraft. These, and other activities, can all provide a little dopamine hit.

But a much stronger and more effective path to happiness is by seeking eudaimonia, the virtuous pursuit of meaningful challenges for the good of the individual and society. There is no doubt that this is a harder path, and one that will bring some discomfort, even to the extent that Marcuse considered that "unhappy nonconformists" were the driving force to greater meaning and freedom and Fromm remarked; "One cannot be deeply responsive to the world without being saddened very often". Or, as my Facebook friend, Robert Baker said a couple of months ago: "anxiety and depression are inevitable symptoms of awareness and care". Eudaimonia doesn't seem like much fun, does it? And in many ways, it isn't. But what brings greater and longer happiness? A trivial and amusing purchase or the personal achievement of a meaningful task? The research is quite clear; it is eudaimonic activities that predict future well-being.

Eudaimonic activities are firmly in the camp of the Socratic triad of Truth, Justice, and Beauty, which is a foundation to contemporary pragmatic philosophy. But they do exist in a continuum with the hedonic; over the weekend Erica H and I spent several hours catching up on episodes of The Blacklist, which is perhaps not great art but certainly a cut higher than switching one's brain off. On Monday night I played a session of the Burning Wheel RPG set in the Thirty Years' War, arguably the most bloody religious conflict in history; is this just fun or is there more than a touch of historical research in the guise of an amateur radio play? As the dialectic and the Dao, both say; you set something up as binary opposites, and you've set up a continuum where there is a little bit of each in the other; that is why happiness, meaning, success, and enjoyment is a pursuit.
tcpip: (Default)
The subject title hints at what was a pretty interesting weekend. With regards to meetings there was my presentation to SoFiA on the topic "Is Moral Reasoning Innate of Learned?; plenty of discussion of course, and a video of the Zoom session is also available. The next meeting, the following day, was the Annual General Meeting of the Victorian Secular Lobby, Inc., where I have been president for over ten years. I've stepped down from that role and Andrew Rawling has taken it up, so it's a continuing organisation. I think we've done pretty well in getting our objectives achieved, although there are still a couple of big-ticket items to go.

A very lovely social occasion was a visit to The Rookery from Eddie, Robbie, Liana, and Nick for "linner", which developed further into the night, after animated conversation, into dance lesson instructions from Nick who knows a thing or two about such things, and a little bit of fencing instructions from myself, which is also a form of dancing. Actually, on that matter, it is a gap in my entry into proper society, right? I might be a scholar and gentleman, once who has toured to The Continent a few times, one who can ride a horse, shoot a pistol, and compose prose and poetry, but I have never learned to dance - well, not since school, anyway. So that is something I intend to change, and apparently, a smart thing to learn at my age.

Of course, I had to hit the books on the weekend, and I have again found myself on top of the Duolingo Diamond league after working through an unreasonable quantity of lessons on Sunday across French, Spanish, German, Esperanto, and Chinese. I actually topped the league a few weeks ago, and completely neglected to mention that. I rather wish that Duolingo had Thai as one of its courses as I find myself spending a bit of time on that language as well. As required of course there was also the need to put together a couple of thousand words for my final psych essay for the semester - almost done, except for the editing! How was your weekend?
tcpip: (Default)
The past several days have been almost entirely dominated by scholarly pursuits, the most important (at least personally) was handing in my MHEd thesis on Monday; I've already mentioned this on Facebook with some rather lovely comments and recognition from friends. Assuming I pass that will be the end of two and half years of studying this subject, with numerous essays on the nature of advanced technical education, public economics and systems engineering, and university leadership. I am very thankful for those who engaged in the qualitative interviews for the thesis and also to Kayo who really provided superb insight and experience on the subject matter and recruiting of subjects. I honestly could not have ended up with the thesis that I did without their support and participation. Not one to let something like a thesis stop me, I have also been working on my next essay for my GradDip in Applied Psychology which, with no sense of temporal irony, is an experiment in qualitative interview techniques. That degree should be finished in the middle of next year.

Apropos, coming up tomorrow I am giving a talk at the Sea of Faith in Australia on Saturday at 2pm on "Is Moral Reasoning Innate or Learned?"; contact me for a Zoom link. The following day is also the Annual General Meeting of the Victorian Secular Lobby, an organisation I helped found in 2010, and that I have been president for most of this time. I will be standing down from this role at the meeting and there is the possibility that the organisation will disband; that will be up to the members and whether someone else takes up the role of the convenor. Despite this possibility, I think the organisation did pretty well over the years; we had stated objectives and we pretty much saw most of them actually come to pass. The biggest issues remain the School Chaplaincy project and the automatic status of religious bodies as charities.

Work has also been a site of some teaching and learning this week as well. For the past two days I have been conducting workshops on Linux, HPC job submission, and shell scripting as is typical every month or so. Further, however, the Cultural Working Group hosted one of our regular researcher presentations, this time with Associate Professor Adrian Bickerstaffe from the Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics discussing how Research Computing Services has provided assistance in the study participant engagement, application hosting, management of very large datasets, and genomic analyses. It is this sort of thing that gets me up in the morning; working with supercomputers is great and all with plenty of interesting technical challenges, but knowing that they are used to improve and save lives is my primary motivator.
tcpip: (Default)
Last Thursday evening I gave a presentation to SoFiA Melbourne on "From Stoicism and Natural Pantheism to Effective Altruism" which weighs in at some 2500 words. Apart from what is included on the title, also had quite a bit on the relationship between Stoicism and therapeutic techniques. Like any school of philosophy, I have some significant disagreements with the Stoics and lean more towards the Peripatetics when it comes to virtue and external goods, but I really do admire their early pantheism and their contributions to cognitive behaviour and its successors. Over the past two years, I increasingly feel my interest in such matters is increasingly going to be one of my life projects, and I feel pretty good about that. The presentation went well, there were some excellent questions from the audience, and I caught up with Nigel S., a dear friend whom I hadn't seen for quite a few years.

Work-wise the past three days have consisted of delivering high-performance computing workshops; the first two (intro to supercomputing, shell scripting for HPC) went quite well. But I found, unusually, that I was a bit out-of-sorts for the third (parallel processing) and finished the workshop a little earlier than usual - even with the addition of some new content (recurring jobs). In hindsight, I realise the reason was that I was simply exhausted from the previous two days of workshops and the evening's Stoic presentation - even an extrovert such as myself who is energised with communication in groups can run out of steam. Worse still, I was cognisant that this might happen beforehand. Oh well, all in the past. I know to timetable myself with just two workshops rather than three in succession.

Following an important dinner with Robin M., and Anthony L., on Friday night, on Saturday spent a good portion of the day preparing food and drinks for the Wild Arts Social Club dinner at The Rookery. Apparently, my dining room can fit 15 people in it with plenty of room to spare, so that's a good sign that the apartment can hold such events at this scale so there will be more to come. It was a wonderful night of animated conversation with some pretty amazing people, veritable mountains of food, and a wonderful dance performance with private randomly (fated?) readings in the study from the famous Sufi poet Rumi ("The ruby and the sunrise are one"); I provided my own Sufi story in return. The porró drinking game also proved to be a bit of a hit. Sabre, bless her old cat heart, decided to join in the party rather than hiding in the wardrobe, as expected, and was on excellent behaviour. Many thanks to Miriam G., as organiser, Sandy, Dave, Gerhard, and Rob for bringing even more delicious food (have I missed anyone?), and to all attendees.
tcpip: (Default)
What does one do when they're already ahead in their psych degree? Keep going of course. Whereas most would have had fun with friends and family over the Easter weekend, I found myself with three studious matters that had to be done; marking assignments for the master's level computer science course, writing the final version of my MHEd thesis (thankfully extended by a couple more weeks), and working on the second assignment for my psych degree. Perhaps unsurprisingly, such a study in Aotearoa New Zealand has a very significant Maori culture component which is mostly new and worthwhile territory for me. Apropos such matters, I've found myself invited and joining a committee for the BPD Community because that's the sort of practical activity I engage in. Their meeting the evening prior was quite an eye-opening event and very informative; far more than my own psych session earlier that day that could have been an email. My strong preference for "quality time" extends to all relationships, personal and professional. I also had an excellent meeting tonight with a new friend and fellow student of psychology, the very clever Larnie, who has some particularly impressive plans and I believe they have the experience, skills, and aptitude to carry them out.

Tomorrow I am giving a presentation to SoFiA at the Carlton North library (corner of Rathdowne at Newry Streets, 7.30pm) on "From Stoicism and Naturalistic Pantheism to Effective Altruism". Whilst I will post a transcript on the Lightbringers site, it is valuable at this stage to give a brief overview. Because as much as the presentation will be a formal advocacy of this position, it is as much an exploration of my own personal journey toward such a model of cognition and behaviour. Some of this I have discussed previously, such as "Is Pantheism an Atheism?", to the Melbourne Atheist Society in August 2016, Pantheism: Beyond Atheism and Theism" presented to SoFiA, Melbourne, in July 2021, and "The Continuum of 'Needs' and 'Wants'" to the Melbourne Agnostics in November 2020. This presentation will note the relevance of Stoicism to contemporary times, and especially its important role in both positive and clinical psychology, an elaboration of the Stoic views of physics, and in particular their contribution to pantheism in general and natural pantheism in particular, and finally an application of Stoicism and natural pantheism to effective altruism.
tcpip: (Default)
Last Sunday I gave my presentation on "Pantheism: Beyond Theism and Atheism", which seemed to go fairly well with a pretty good turnout and excellent discussion. An MP4 audio-video recording is also available. There was a hint that perhaps I will do a follow-up presentation on "unverifiable ontologies", that is metaphysics, metaideals, metasymbols some time in the future, and also a reminder to self to put on paper (so to speak) thoughts about Spinoza's rational pantheism and the nature of the infinite, as twice now I have presented primarily on subjective experientiality. As pointed out in the presentation there was a little twist, namely if the universe is considered to be divine in the pantheistic perspective then the secular transcendentals (Truth, Justice, Beauty) must be considered, in some sense, "holy".

It is with this in mind one can think of the "freedom" rallies held in Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane over the weekend. Now here's a curious thing; I support the choice of people not to undergo vaccinations on the basis of personal preference, even if I think they are completely ignorant in doing so. However, their "freedom" is also balanced an obligation to respect the safety of the rest of the public. This means movement restrictions and masks in public are valid, as are vaccination requirements for workplaces etc, even to the French method where a health pass is required for restaurants, trains, planes, and some public venues. . If people don't like this they find themselves their own special community to live in, a sort of quarantine from everyone else, or a big 'flu party if you like. I am prepared to take suggestions from Australia's currently uninhabited islands where this should be. Proper shelters can be constructed and food drops arranged. We won't need them for long, right?

It's all part of that difficult balance between truth and freedom, and the challenge when practices and expressions become objectively harmful. I have written about this before in the context of political advertising, suggesting that voters deserve the same protections from politicians as consumers. Of course, in the scientific world, there is a well-established practice of hypothesis-making and hypothesis-breaking where facts trump feelings as a matter of professional competence. "Science is not a democracy", as they say. Sometimes that can lead to surprises; I only recently became aware that the clinical results of the curative properties of aloe vera are mixed at best, regardless of subjective experiences. The most difficult confirmation bias is one's own opinion, experience, and iatrogenic memories, which is why corroborative and external evidence is requisite. But how many are going to believe external evidence against their own feelings and thoughts?
tcpip: (Default)
It is a rather extraordinary success of modern science that we have vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, especially considering that there other coronaviruses in existence prior to the pandemic, and there had been no vaccines for those. With that in mind, about a year ago, I started saying to those close to me that everyone will become infected eventually. That was the entire point of "flattening the curve" and "elimination" strategies; keep the infection rates down so the health systems can cope. Now people can become infected but will resist the infection with vaccines if they have been applied. In the meantime, the pandemic marches on and as it has now caused three million deaths, I penned a few words on the matter of developmental economics and health policy. From the relative safety and isolation of Australia, I can but look on in despondency as the case and fatality numbers continue their trend in places like the United States, India, Brazil, and many others.

It is also from this vantage point that I have two new short initiatives in recent days. The first arose from rage-quitting a frankly terrible course that I found myself enrolled in teaching online learning. I thought it might be useful for my own teaching and, whilst it did include some interesting, if speculative, edge-cases for education theory (heutagogy, rhizomatic learning). But the actual content was simply the worst I had ever encountered in any of the numerous tertiary courses that I have taken, with no consideration of the suggested tools in their operating context, or with policy considerations. I expressed my considered opinions quite bluntly in leaving the course but, not being the sort of person who likes to convert problems into opportunities, I have now started elaborating a more prescriptive solution on how one should such tools for educational purposes, for publication in an appropriate journal. Finding a co-author or two of a like mind on the issue would be excellent as well, he hints broadly.

Recently I have also been inspired to dust-off some old notes regarding Plato's Symposium, the famous drinking-party of the (male) philosophers in praise of the god Eros. It is from this narration that we have derived the terms "Platonic friendship" and "Platonic love" in popular culture, although they are obviously not used in the text itself. To be fair, some popular advice surrounding such terms can be quite useful and even nuanced to the complexity surrounding such a relationship, although there is no doubt that they are removed from the "ladder of love", expressed in the Symposium (from physical desire to love of the idea of beauty itself). One element that really intrigues me is the reported relationship between Socrates and Alcibiades, and the context in which the story was written. I am the debt of Bruce T., for first raising these matters to me some decades ago, and with scholarship in journals seemingly lacking in elaboration on these matters, I find myself beginning another journal article. Again, I will find among my friends surely there is someone who is sufficiently well-versed in the classics to contribute.
tcpip: (Default)
Cyberpunk 2020: Year of the Stainless Steel Rat convention continues in its development. A massive success in the past few days was scoring major author Walter Jon Williams as a speaker. Hardwired is, of course, one of the earliest and most famous cyberpunk novels and was certainly one of the first that introduced me to the genre. Nevertheless, with no intention to stop, the quest is on to bring even more interested and interesting panelists along with the fans. Appropriately, played in a session of CyberDarkSpace on Thursday night. Still working on what was supposed to be the September release of RPG Review - only five more pages to go! In the past week I've managed to put together reviews of In Nomine, Little Fears, and LexOccultum. The latter was particularly appropriate with watching the series La Révolution, a very fine example of historical horror-fiction.

Earlier this week delivered two HPC workshops on successive days; Regular Expressions with Linux, followed by Mathematical Applications and Programming. The latter was the first time I'd run the course at UniMelb and I must confess it was quite difficult, mainly because there is so many relevant applications; from core Linux utilities, to giants like R, Octave, and Maxima, to impressive new upstarts like Julia. Bringing all those under a single umbrella in four hours is difficult and there will be future fine-tuning. In comparison, I attended an Australian BioCommons workshop today on what was supposed to be data management, but really it was a really basic showcase for CloudStore. As a related online meeting, managed to squeeze in an hour to see a live presentation by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz on "Regulating Big Tech", which was heavily orientated around media quality, fake news, and social media. In further academic matters, today I ventured out to Swinburne University to help give [livejournal.com profile] lei_loo more of a feel for the place. She's been a bit unlucky in finishing tertiary studies, but this time she has a superhero in such matters for support, and I know she'll make it.

"Life is for the living"; a saying which was strongly affirmed recently when I attended a funeral procession and celebratory wake in a local park and gardens. It did not know the deceased (it was a friend of lei_loo's) but I can determine from their friends that being driven down a major road in an old Cadillac with cheering support from the procession behind and from the kerbside was just what they would have wanted (and probably planned). It also served as yet another reminder of our temporal state. To be a passive consumer of the arts, to be a mere subject of laws, to be neglectfully ignorant of science, is about a close to being mentally dead as far as I'm concerned, and I despair when I see it happen. The purpose of consumption is to inspire critique and from critique we prepare ourselves to make a better world; whether through the expressions of art, the justice of laws, or the discoveries of science. It is not even success in those fields that makes us truly human, but the very struggle itself to improve; that is living.
tcpip: (Default)
Friday afternoon marked the moment when I begin a one-week Claytons Holiday, the holiday you have when you're not having a holiday. I have accumulated too much leave according to the powers that be, and as I result I had a cunning plan to go visit friends in Adelaide for several days. Then, the world being what it is, my home city has a second outbreak of The Plague, not helped by the fact that almost ninety percent of those sick are not self-isolating when they have initial symptoms and over half when they have tests. There are structural problems of course; rubbish employers, casualisation of the workforce and lack of paid pandemic leave. But there is also a fair degree of irresponsible individualism and a smaller number of hoax-believers; an issue which New Zeland-Aotearoa did not face. So with the upswing of community transmissions, masks are now mandatory in the city and surrounds, and my planned trip to Adelaide to visit friends and wineries has become a future dream.

The early portion of yesterday left me wondering what the hell I was going to do for the coming week, which is hilarious in hindsight given my extensive "to do" list and the fact that I am working on multiple postgraduate degrees, books, journals, presentations, languages, etc. I've picked out about a dozen items from said list most of which will take around half a day to complete which also leaves my usual free time for my usual extracurricular activities. In recent days, I should also note, includes a submission to the Victorian ALP's administrators on party reform to prevent branch-stacking, a session write-up for my regular Eclipse Phase game, a piece on Linux utilities for image processing, specifically, Batch Image Processing, and finally, a review of Meditations, by Marcus Aurelius. The latter is dedicated to Richard Barker, on the first anniversary of his death, who was a particularly good example of Stoic philosophy himself. I am fortunate to have encountered such influences in my life.

It is not often that I have even the remotest excuse to make comment about ducks in my journal, but there have been three duck-related experiences in recent days so they can be combined into a single paragraph of anatidae recognition. The first was the discovery of a pair of ducks in the locally introduced wetlands, which was just built some eighteen months or so prior. Of course with the Yarra River being so close there such birds are common, but this is the first time some have made it thus far, which bodes well for the future. The second was Sunday's RuneQuest Glorantha session, where I play the role of a sapient duck on a flat earth, which is about as high fantasy as one can get. I really quite like the disposition of Glorantha ducks. They seem comical but are grim warriors against undead hordes, cursed with flightnessess by the Sun God, and incurably miserable fatalists as a result. To err is Human, to be blamed is Duck is one of their stock cultural phrases. Finally, I tried out last night some fake roast duck (faux canard, as my prurient humour would suggest) in a meal which was very successful, the texture and flavour being quite close to the real thing. Mac The Cat was quite interested as well, and fortunately, we have some (real) duck liver treats on-hand so he didn't miss out.
tcpip: (Default)
Several weeks ago I made the announcement to the committee that I intend to resign as president of the RPG Review Cooperative, and as editor of the eponymous journal which I have edited for over ten years. I'll see out the year, and will continue to assist on the technical side of things. The hunt is on for one or more people who are willing and able to take these roles, and it is my intention to follow through with assistance and mentorship. Yet as one exits one door, another opens, I have become the University Outreach Officer for the International Society for Philosophers. There is a publishing arm associated with the Society as well, which will be a handy opportunity to compile a number of essays on pragmatism and pantheism in particular that I have written or presented over the years.

Workwise, the three-day outage of the Spartan HPC system was completed successfully. New filesystem (Spectrum Scale aka GPFS) replacing CephFS, new LMod/Easybuild system in place, and a few thousand new cores with the old cloud partition retired, and of course, extensive additions and testing to our sample job scripts, and a re-working of the entire website workflow (it needed it). Today was the first of two days of classes, literally hours after completing the outage and all went reasonably well. It followed after a two-hour tutorial for my course in higher education; and with an HPC certification forum the evening before. All this said, I am somewhat looking forward to a few day's leave next week, even if The Plague means that my ticket to Adelaide is useless.

As mentioned in my last post, I've put together a short essay on a couple of Fake News issues (local BLM, global hydroxychloroquine), where I raise the question on whether free speech is limited by at less some association with the truth. It is a curious feeling that to watch the continuing unfolding of the global pandemic with its still worsening toll of infections (15.4m) and fatalities (631K) when comparing it with my own, micro-level, health. Compared with this time last year, my weight is down some 22kg less (15 in the past three months), and my fitness levels continue to improve. A biennial check for bowel cancer (Australia does this by post, which is somewhat amusing) has come back negative, and I have a hepatobiliary telehealth booking in the future for my occasional stomach issues.
tcpip: (Default)
With regard to circuses, I dived into the Duolingo Latin course and completed it in four days. OK, it's in beta and as a result is heavily truncated compared to other courses. But even so, I normally would put aside a month of dedicated time to complete a tree. I must confess I was heavily helped by prior exposure to other romance languages, especially Italian and Esperanto. I am obviously going to have review everything a few more times as most of my successful answers were more due to recognising the right word in a sentence, rather than expertise in the various cases. That will come with revision, which I could probably do alongside Russian revision, given that languages love of cases.

In another circus-related activity, I've been slowly shifting all my various philosophical essays to the Lightbringers site that I operate. That's a process that I started literally several years ago, and only finished today. Sadly, I have also discovered that there is a number of missing presentations that I do not have hidden away online on historical sites (even using the wayback engine). This includes presentations to The Philosophy Forum on The Causes and Prevention of Violence, and The Philosophy of Education and Development, among others from around 2010. Hopefully I have a backup of them somewhere.

Bread-wise, work has seen the introduction of a new build system, still based on EasyBuild, but with stricter use of the modules hierarchy available in LMod. It is especially tricky during the tranistion period as we've needed to set up both side-by-side, with the eventual plan of shifting everything to the new system. There are some advantages, I will admit, although it is experiencing some infrastructure teething issues. Anyway the practical upshot of this has been that a lot of software that we already have installed is being re-installed to the lastest compiler versions, which of course is pretty time consuming at this stage, but will pay off in the longer run.

It is that time of year where various organisations, business and otherwise, are winding down and having their celebratory events. Our own workplace has two (one official, one unofficial) activities slated and whilst I'll put in an appearance at both of those, I'm making a deliberate and wilful effort to avoid any others this year. Whilst others are winding down, I'm increasingly ramping up to a mad panic and I try to pretend to get at least a portion of my year's aims and objectives towards a semblance of completion. If I am not too harsh on myself, I've actually done most of what I set out to do, and with additional actions replacing those I did not. But I am like this most Decembers, and I really shouldn't expect this one to be any different.
tcpip: (Default)
The past four nights have been spent moving furniture out of the two storerooms on the second level to either the attic bedroom, or the ground floor lounge-room and dining room. This included a total of some 16 bookcases, a similar number of 50L tubs, also full of books, a large desk, a filing cabinet, at least a half-dozen desktop systems, a spare bed, and other assorted bits-and-pieces. I'm covered in bruises as a result and feeling a bit sore. It has been, of course, some 10 years since all this furnishing has been shifted. Mac the cat has gone into hiding somewhere. Anyway it's all done just in time for the flooring people to come in tomorrow, rip up the thirty-year old carpet (largely destroyed by past pet rabbits, guinea pigs, and rats), and replace it with a new underlay and some nice laminate boards. I rather suspect that the rest of the house will have to wait until returning from Europe, which is a mere couple of weeks which is, of course, plenty of time to organise hotels and trains, right?

When not shifting several thousand books and associated meubles around the place, I've been at work, primarily engaged in teaching on Monday and Tuesday; the usual classes, Introduction to Linux and HPC and Advanced Linux and Shell Scripting for HPC. I admit I was pretty tired during the courses, but I can run at least these ones whilst almost dead, I am sure. This said, every class I do try to introduce or modify the content slightly, and this one expanded the archiving options to include various tools for viewing archives without uncompressing them. The classes were pretty switched on, and there is one particular project that we'll follow up on, seeing how much parallelisation we can force out of large coastal dataset for Delft3D. Horrible software, but then again a lot of scientific software is written with idiosyncratic approaches, often ignoring well-known conventions in favour of what the development group things is a good idea for their environment. "We found this software useful, and hope you will too". Well, as the Germans say Hoffnung ist keine Strategie.

The next two days I'll be working from home. I have a small mountain of work which is suitable from such a location (including the Delft3D issue) and it means I can be around to let the tradies in and their work on-site. I also have a paper revision for Open Philosophy to submit on reproduibility issues in computer modelling, along with an phenomenology paper to finish for the journal Philosophy Study. Fortunately both are pretty much done, so they're not going to be too time-consuming by any stretch of the imagination. Actually, I probably have several philosophy papers that I probably should get published, mainly from various talks that I've presented over the past ten years or so. I really want to see Mary, the Swampy Philosophical Zombie, Is In Your Chinese Room! Problems With Reductionist Theories of Consciousness, and not only for the title.
tcpip: (Default)
Today was my Public Economics exam, which is probably my strongest subject in this degree and I think I went pretty well. Of course, Public Economics is probably my strong subject in this area because I am fascinated by how unrealistic mainstream economic models are, and what goes wrong when they are applied without due consideration. Issues such as imperfect competition, asymmetric information, externalities, and rent-seeking are the norm, not the exception. Coming up soon is exams in macroeconomics and microeconomics which I suspect will be a lot more difficult for me, especially with the minimal time I have had available to do these courses. The microeconomics subject is particularly heavy on the analytic side which will require a lot of preparation over the next few days - which means skipping a couple of gaming sessions.

In the meantime I have completed the first draft of a paper for Open Philosophy on the problems of reproducibility in computational simulations (it's a special issue on the latter subject), along with the proposal to the Australian Research Data Commons to help establish a workshop-forum and data repository of HPC educational material and delivery techniques. Also worth mentioning that after five years on the waiting list I finished the last component to become a certified Software Carpentry trainer. Finally, have also completed a piece of formal assessment for my higher education degree by writing up the rationale for the International HPC Certification Forum. This is an interesting report, whereby the components are put together piecemeal, reviewed, and then recompiled into the final submission.

My daily 'blog of the federal election campaign continues, although it has slipped to every second day or so as the train-wreck continues in slow-motion. Also, received a midnight 'phone call from a locum at Rick's care facility to say that he had blood in his urine, which is usually not a good sign. There was no associated fever so he was kept under observation. I dropped by the following day to check on him, but and I haven't heard anything else since so one assumes all is well. Any worries I may have need to be put in the "cannot do anything about it" category, especially with the presence of various worries that I can act on.
tcpip: (Default)
Visited the doctor on Monday to discuss my bronchitis and they were of the opinion that it's on its way to clear up. Now back at work, although being careful not to overdo it, and still prone to some coughing (and keeping a good arm's length form workmates). I am far from operating at 100%, and I suspect it will be several days before I am completely in the clear. Will be going in for blood tests as part of a general checkup and chest x-rays as part of the hemoptysis, although this is almost certainly part of the bronchitis rather than anything more serious. There are now four days of my life which were pretty much spent on the couch wrapped in a blanket and sipping tea with a rapidly emptying box of tissues next to me, whilst playing Supertuxkart and Torcs.

Among all this I have managed to step outside into the world for brief periods of time. On Sunday I presented at The Philosophy Forum on The Philosophy of Technology, which is a subject that I have had a long standing interest in. Take away message; technology has ontological and empirical priority over science which provides epistemological abstraction and rational predictions. On Tuesday night presented at Linux Users of Victoria on New Developments in Supercomputing, deriving from material from ISC and the HPC Advisory Council conferences. Of particular interest to me is the number of issues and challenges that Intel, that most mighty of chip manufacturers, has faced over the past year - and how competitors are positioning themselves. Also last week wrote a whimsically entitled piece for Isocracy on Killing and Eating Your Prime Minister following the circus that has been Australian politics recently.

Various gaming plans have been put on hold over the past few days, which I really need to get my teeth into. Final confirmations with Kryal Castle are being put in place for RuneQuest Con Down Under III, a LARP scenario has been received, Chaosium are providing prizes and an organised play scenario and so forth. Tickets will be on sale very soon, just as the final budget it put together. Plus there is the RuneQuest special of RPG Review coming up, plus I am hoping to hold some sort of dinner to celebrate ten years of the publication, and perhaps this can coincide with a new online RPG Review store. This is, of course, in addition to the usual actual play and various writings.
tcpip: (Default)
The past few days I have been in Enschede, a moderately-sized former industrial town near the border of Germany, staying at the deco-era Hotel Rodenbach, situated next door to the pleasant Volkspark. The final night we splashed out a bit and enjoyed a meal at their rather nice restaurant; most other evenings we spent in their rather sizable Oude Markt area. Overall Enschede is really pleasant town with a good mix of interesting architecture, with a good student community, and a moderate amount of industry. It has managed to rebuild itself quite well following a rather dramatic decline in its traditional manufacturing base in the 1980s, reminding me of some the New Zealand towns of a similar vintage (e.g., Cambridge).

The purpose of this visit to a such a relatively obscure place has been for a philosophy of technology conference at the University of Twente. My own paper, Transparency and Immersion in High Performance Computing basically argued that (a) the command-line interface will always be necessary for speed and capability and especially for HPC and that (b) it also needs to be updated in terms of syntax, structure, and linguistic scope for greater intuition, although I did have a fairly pessimistic conclusion on the chances this would occur. As once remarked: "We think an act according to habit, and the extraordinary resistance offered to even minimal departures from custom is due more to inertia than to any conscious desire to maintain usages which have a clear function" (Levi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology).

For a conference that was expecting 50 people and ended up with over 200, it was quite stimulating. I made a couple of relatively important contacts, including Don Ihde, whose phenomenology of technology was extremely influential in my own thinking on the subject, and Rosi Braidotti who gave an absolutely firey presentation on the current state of critical theory and post-structuralism. In addition there is at least three other people whom I am hoping to have further collaborations with in the future across the disciplines of Habermas' critical theory and technology, cultural studies, and Internet privacy. Overall, it was a really good event and a credit to the organisers. Nearly all the speakers I heard were very knowledgeable about their respective subject matter and raised important issues on human-technology interactions, and many were from backgrounds that knew the technical details intimately. But as stimulating as it was, it was also a reminder on the discipline: "if you want to be a philosophy graduate, you'd better get a taxi license as well!". Philosophy as a profession is rarely the path to a secure or even moderate income.

Profile

tcpip: (Default)
Diary of a B+ Grade Polymath

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 08:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios