I've spent the past couple of days off recovering from a minor cold, a negative RAT reducing concerns that it could have been the dreaded 'rona. Australia, having decided to "live with the virus" after reaching a low vaccination threshold now is seeing the effects. On December 31, the country had 2353 deaths due to COVID-19; now we're up to 7794 and growing. One wonders at what point we realise that this is not over and that vaccination plus some social distancing measures are required. I now have a number of friends that are in isolation because of it, one of whom I must admit I was very concerned about as it hit them pretty hard. Fortunately, they now seem to be on the path to recovery, but not without a feverish few days (and a rather scary related injury). Whilst many will get only moderate effects, whether due to initial viral load, the strain of the virus, or their immune system response, I readily admit to being a little risk-averse by disposition.
On a related matter last Sunday I gave an address to the Melbourne Unitarian-Universalist Fellowship, "We Are What We Do: Emotions, Trauma, and Happiness". The transcript includes several links to points I made which, of course, one cannot elaborate on in the actual presentation. Nevertheless, the round-table discussion that followed afterward was very valuable. Along the same trajectory the following day I finished my second assignment for my psychology degree which was on Maori health models, which is far more holistic than the effective split between psychology (clinical, positive) and sociology; I took up Te Pae Mahutonga as an example for study.
A few days ago I wrote a piece about the storm that kicked off in the election about minimum wage payments which, apart from the economics, it strikes me as lacking in empathy to tell such workers that they're good enough to be classified as "essential workers", get the highest rates of infection and lowest rates of health care, but are not deserving of an extra $1 per hour to live on (the actual debate comes down to 38c per hour). Now the latest suggestion is that young people can divest the minimal superannuation that they have to transfer wealth to those who own property, rather than addressing the main issue of land (no, not housing) prices. Economists universally agree that this will lead to higher home prices and that superannuation is a better investment anyway, which makes this either (a) a complete brain-fart or (b) a stealthy attempt to transfer intergenerational money from the young poor to the older rich. Guess which one I think it is?
On a related matter last Sunday I gave an address to the Melbourne Unitarian-Universalist Fellowship, "We Are What We Do: Emotions, Trauma, and Happiness". The transcript includes several links to points I made which, of course, one cannot elaborate on in the actual presentation. Nevertheless, the round-table discussion that followed afterward was very valuable. Along the same trajectory the following day I finished my second assignment for my psychology degree which was on Maori health models, which is far more holistic than the effective split between psychology (clinical, positive) and sociology; I took up Te Pae Mahutonga as an example for study.
A few days ago I wrote a piece about the storm that kicked off in the election about minimum wage payments which, apart from the economics, it strikes me as lacking in empathy to tell such workers that they're good enough to be classified as "essential workers", get the highest rates of infection and lowest rates of health care, but are not deserving of an extra $1 per hour to live on (the actual debate comes down to 38c per hour). Now the latest suggestion is that young people can divest the minimal superannuation that they have to transfer wealth to those who own property, rather than addressing the main issue of land (no, not housing) prices. Economists universally agree that this will lead to higher home prices and that superannuation is a better investment anyway, which makes this either (a) a complete brain-fart or (b) a stealthy attempt to transfer intergenerational money from the young poor to the older rich. Guess which one I think it is?