Date: 2009-08-01 03:29 am (UTC)
Oh, I wasn't trying to suggest that it was.

I was simply curious because it conflicted with the information we'd recently been given by accountants, estate lawyers and the like. I like to know when the information I'm basing my decisions on might be out-of-date.

Though when you respond to the (granted, smiley-faced and presumably less than serious) question "Do you have to get civilly united?" by giving only it as a reason, I trust you can see why one might think that it could be a significant consideration, if not the significant consideration? *smile*
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tcpip: (Default)
Diary of a B+ Grade Polymath

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 06:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios