Name our Manx, Watchmen, Economics, Stuff
Mar. 15th, 2009 10:37 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)

Went to see Watchmen last night. It has some changes from Allan Moore's classic comic series of superheroes and the very real fear in the early 1980s of nuclear war, but the changes don't alter the storyline or theme and indeed the one big change at the end actually makes much more sense (big credits here to the screenwriters, who must had balls of steel to try this). It is that the core content was included in the 170 minutes and the charactre portrayals as pretty good well, especially Jackie Earle Haley as Rorschach. I suspect that history will largely absolve Zack Snyder's pretty average effort with 300 with this film. A genuine pity that Pop Will Eat Itself's Def Con One wasn't included in the soundtrack.
An inordinate amount of time was spent this week writing Normative and Postive Economics: An Isocratic Sketch, an attempts to reconcile, or at least find appropriate types of economic activity for socialist and capitalist means of ownership and planned or market means of distribution and exchange, and at the same time recommending the socialisation of income from natural resources. Comments invited. This week I also joined Amnesty International Australia. This is an organisation I joined and let my membership lapse several times over the past twenty-five years or so. This time, I've checked the box for 'renew every year'; the wonders of modern technology!
Recently
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 10:21 am (UTC)It's a fairly odd road to walk, that tries to combine Marxian-influenced Georgism and pro-capitalist Austrian school models. No doubt many from both sides do not think it's possible.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 07:08 pm (UTC)The passage:
"A general principle that can be suggested here is that the closer that a good or service is to being a natural monopoly the greater the requirement for centralised socialisation as a public service, and the close the good or service is to being in accord to perfect competition (including monopolistic competition), the greater the requirement for decentralised private ownership in a variety of forms (including cooperatives etc). Likewise the smaller the number of input and output variables the greater the possibility of accurate planning, whereas the greater number of such variables suggests efficacy of a price mechanism to deal with issues of relative scarcity and opportunity cost. The aforementioned public income should be spend entirely on matters of transparent public goods for the general benefit; the mitigation of negative externalities (e.g., pollution), the enhancement of positive externalities (e.g., networks, education)."
Is an excellent suggestion, which I note does fit with what I've found in restudying economics.
I'm an econ geek. It was economics that got me into politics and at first libertarianism.
I'm increasingly Georgian and that combination of institutions described above is a good summary of my current thinking.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 10:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-15 10:29 pm (UTC)http://isocracy.org/user/register