tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
Australia is leaving Iraq, after costing 2.3 billion in public funds. A legal brief has been sent to the International Criminal Court claiming John Howard committed war crimes in authorising the invasion. Kevin Rudd's comments lend credibility to the claim, saying that the invasion was conducted "without a full and proper assessment". I am glad we are washing our hands of this tawdry affair. The invasion was without ethical or legal justification and the only reason a similar writ hasn't been served on George W. Bush is because the United States is a rogue nation in its failiure to join the International Criminal Court. Getting Bush on trial is going to be a task for the American people alone.

On a related matter I have recently ended up in a bit of a debate with my religious colleagues concerning the self-determination of the Tibetan people. In the last two issues of the Beacon they have published an article by Michael Parenti who rejects a utopian potrayal of Tibet as an independent regime. My criticism of the article (last page, second issue) is that none of this deals with the basic principle of self-determination of nationalities. The lengthy response by the editors utterly fails to address this basic matter. As a result of their failure, I've joined the Australia-Tibet Council.

Went to see the latest Indianna Jones film on Saturday. It's a significant step down from the eighties classics; not a disaster, but if I'd known beforehand what it was like I wouldn't have bothered to see it at the cinema. Gaming has been good with an excellent session of RuneQuest: River of Cradles (example story in lin) last Sunday (and with a new player, Sam) and with good developments in the two PBeM games that I'm running. I also have another RPG-related annoucement to make, but that's going to have to wait until the next post ;-)

Date: 2008-07-10 01:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mia76.livejournal.com
wow, "war crimes" is strong language... although it does make a lot of sense. i kept wondering what the US/UK/etc were doing there. literally, i'm not saying this to be ironic or anything. i'd be sitting in front of the TV thinking, "wait, these people have no business being there... what are they doing there again?" and i'd feel so ignorant for thinking so. but then maybe everyone else was just as confused... i don't know.

Date: 2008-07-10 01:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com
Well the limitations of war crimes as defined by the ICC are pretty specific and I can't say I've seen the brief. One of the important limitations is that the breaches must be "part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes" rather than isolated instances.

I don't think however there is much question that the invasion itself was illegal. Only the UN Security Council has the right to organise interventions of member states.

Preferably those involved should have no perceived vested interest either. To a degree, I actually opposed the use of Australian troops in Timor Leste on those grounds and I can certainly see what many Indonesians were not terribly keen on that either. If time was permitting I would have probably preferred a peace-keeping force of Swedes, Bolivians, Canadians and Algerians!

Profile

tcpip: (Default)
Diary of a B+ Grade Polymath

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
1112131415 1617
18192021 222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 07:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios