![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tcpipI predict a close victory for Labor.
Unlike most elections where a government can sometimes claw back a couple of percentage points over the weeks, I suspect Howard is going to lose ground in this election. True, he took a bold gamble on running the campaign on trust particularly considering his dubious record on East Timor, asylum seekers, weapons of mass destruction and the invasion of Iraq. This actions of course haven't damaged Howard's reputation among self-interested Australians, who couldn't give two figs if all the refo kids are bombed out the water, the Timorese are invaded or Iraq becomes a living hell, as long as their pay packets are OK. As is increasingly evident, these issues are actually damaging to the electoral core of the Liberal Party, the comfortable middle-class who see the politics of a nation as expression of the national values of liberal democracy, open government, the rule of law etc. Howard has substantially undermined all of these. On October 9, keep an eye on John Howard's seat of Bennelong, the extremely blue-blood seat of Wentworth which in all probability will fall to Liberal independent Peter King, and Alexander Downer's seat of Mayo which will probably go to preferences despite being held by a 14 percent margin.
The election will be largely fought in the marginal seats of Queensland and New South Wales where none of Labor's seats are in any serious trouble, except for the marginal seat of Bowman which due to boundary changes now has a notional Liberal majority (but Labor will undoubtably pick up the new seat of Bonner). Conversely, the coalition risks a great deal, holding paper-thin majorities in far too many. In Queensland, Herbert (1.5% margin) and Morton (2.5% margin) will be Labor gains, with the possibility of Longman (2.5%) and Hinkler (2.3%). Why people still vote for the coalition in Petrie (margin 3.5%) is beyond me, given the nature of the neighbourhood. Farmers (especially sugar farmers) in rural Queensland are likely to keep the National Party extremely busy, especially after their failures and public commitments to include sugar in the FTA and with the existence of a sitting independent.
New South Wales however is where the Coalition is in serious trouble. At least six seats (Dobell, 0.4%, Parramatte 1.2%, Paterson 1.5%, Calare 1.7%, Eden-Monaro 1.7%, Richmond 1.7%) and the possibility of Page (2.8%) will go Labor's way, whereas it is difficult to see any potential Coalition gains whatsoever. Mark Latham, both as a person and with his message, has far greater affinity in these areas than John Howard and this will prove to be extremely telling in coming weeks.
In other states, Labor will retain both seats in the ACT and all five seats in Tasmania and pick up up the second seat in the Northern Territory. In South Australia, the Coalition will certainly lose Adeliade, Hindmarsh and Makin. The Liberals are fishing for Stirling and Hasluck in Western Australia, but are in dire need to protect Canning as well. In Victoria, Labor premier Steve Bracks seems to have weakened Labor's chance of picking up Deakin over the tollway issue, although it has been pointed out that the state Liberals would do exactly the same thing. One other matter about Deaking - it's the "moral middle-class" discussed in the first paragraph - confusing state and federal issues won't wash with them and they have a strong liberal Christian ethic in many parts of the seat. Keep on eye out on this one. Despite McMillan becoming a notional Liberal seat, the young Labor member Christian Zahra is both popular and a competent campaigner. With some hesitation I would suggest he will retain this seat. The only other places of interest is McEwen which is too close to call and the National's seat Gippsland which is under serious risk from Labor following the incorporation of substantial parts of the La Trobe valley - not to mention a significant move of Victorian diary farmers to the Labor fold over recent years.
So there you have it. At least 12 seats to go to Labor, enough to form a majority government, with the possibility of several more.
I have had a recent run-in with Telstra, over a disputed phone bill from two years ago where the account and the quite modest outstanding balance was transferred into another persons' name just prior to my move to East Timor. It came to a head when I attempted to transfer my old Parliament of Victoria mobile number to my name - and bumped into![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
ultraviolencia who works at a Telstra shop at the same time. I've submitted a complaint to the Telecommunications ombudsman over Telstra's intransigence on the matter and will be going to different providers for all my services. In general, it is clear to see why Lindsay Tanner's suggestion (I may add with significant prompting by myself) that Telstra be split into a private service provider and a public infrastructure maintenance body makes a great deal of sense. Their behaviour is that of an organization that thinks that they are still a monopoly, whereas the only reason that they retain any customers is because of their hold on infrastructure.
In that other news which takes up 99% percent of my life - the two courses of full-time study, the one course of part-time study and my part-time work - all goes well. I am positively flying through the Cert in Business Management being the only person in a class of 37 to have handed in the three assesment tasks (15 haven't handed in any, 14 have handed in one, 7 have handed in two). I am now feeling quite confident with the CCNA, having tested myself on the first part of the exam and getting over 85% whilst literally falling asleep last Monday night. Business goes well with more new clients from the course seeking my attention and a hairdresser where old Perth friend microJames promises to splash a great deal of money in my direction. Editing on the PhD continues as usual.
Last weekend was mostly spent helpingseverina_242 move into her spacious new flat in Elwood - the place that artists inevitably end up when successful in Melbourne. Seeming that she is now employed as a graphic artist it seems quite appropriate. Although time out was taken to attend the Unitarian's whose service fell under the old anarchist slogan "No Gods, No Masters" (very appropriate for the Unitarians, some would say), and the presentation on the introduction of Islamic law in Iraq, its re-establishment in Afghanistan, the force of non-secularists in the United States and the effect on these on women. When one hears about such things it is very easy to understand why people are (a) very cynical about claims of "freedom" and "liberation" when all that seems to occur is a gender-specific "liberation" for economic purposes and (b) why many women are not prone to be particularly supportive of patriachial religions in secular states.
As if it wasn't obvious from many preceeding posts over the past twelve months, I have had a change in diet in the past month which is friendly to mammals. I am still chowing down on chicken and fish and marsupials are a bit of a grey area. I still reckon I would try grilled rat if I get to visit the countryside of southern Viet Nam. Nonetheless, by an large, mammals are off my main culinary activity.
And on a related note, I do have a brain-breaker of the week, which is a bit of an oldie, but a goodie.pr0zac, being a zoologist, was about to attend a lecture on mice and mutant penises and was having a bit of giggle about the fun that zoologists have. In response I pointed her to the unusual penis of the Argentine Duck. Subsequently caseopaya and I discussed what happens to this poor duck. I mean, imagine if it doesn't retract. Whilst flying it would be mistaken for a kite's tail. When swimming a large fish might take a bite out of it. And landing and waddling would cause it to trip over its paddles. The mind boggles!
Update (aka "How did I forget that?")
Gathering of the week was the thirtieth birthday bash at Polly's forusekh. So many el-jay people there, great to see y'all, seeming how little I get out these days. Apologies for not being so bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, but I had been moving furniture all day. And that can be somewhat tiring...
Unlike most elections where a government can sometimes claw back a couple of percentage points over the weeks, I suspect Howard is going to lose ground in this election. True, he took a bold gamble on running the campaign on trust particularly considering his dubious record on East Timor, asylum seekers, weapons of mass destruction and the invasion of Iraq. This actions of course haven't damaged Howard's reputation among self-interested Australians, who couldn't give two figs if all the refo kids are bombed out the water, the Timorese are invaded or Iraq becomes a living hell, as long as their pay packets are OK. As is increasingly evident, these issues are actually damaging to the electoral core of the Liberal Party, the comfortable middle-class who see the politics of a nation as expression of the national values of liberal democracy, open government, the rule of law etc. Howard has substantially undermined all of these. On October 9, keep an eye on John Howard's seat of Bennelong, the extremely blue-blood seat of Wentworth which in all probability will fall to Liberal independent Peter King, and Alexander Downer's seat of Mayo which will probably go to preferences despite being held by a 14 percent margin.
The election will be largely fought in the marginal seats of Queensland and New South Wales where none of Labor's seats are in any serious trouble, except for the marginal seat of Bowman which due to boundary changes now has a notional Liberal majority (but Labor will undoubtably pick up the new seat of Bonner). Conversely, the coalition risks a great deal, holding paper-thin majorities in far too many. In Queensland, Herbert (1.5% margin) and Morton (2.5% margin) will be Labor gains, with the possibility of Longman (2.5%) and Hinkler (2.3%). Why people still vote for the coalition in Petrie (margin 3.5%) is beyond me, given the nature of the neighbourhood. Farmers (especially sugar farmers) in rural Queensland are likely to keep the National Party extremely busy, especially after their failures and public commitments to include sugar in the FTA and with the existence of a sitting independent.
New South Wales however is where the Coalition is in serious trouble. At least six seats (Dobell, 0.4%, Parramatte 1.2%, Paterson 1.5%, Calare 1.7%, Eden-Monaro 1.7%, Richmond 1.7%) and the possibility of Page (2.8%) will go Labor's way, whereas it is difficult to see any potential Coalition gains whatsoever. Mark Latham, both as a person and with his message, has far greater affinity in these areas than John Howard and this will prove to be extremely telling in coming weeks.
In other states, Labor will retain both seats in the ACT and all five seats in Tasmania and pick up up the second seat in the Northern Territory. In South Australia, the Coalition will certainly lose Adeliade, Hindmarsh and Makin. The Liberals are fishing for Stirling and Hasluck in Western Australia, but are in dire need to protect Canning as well. In Victoria, Labor premier Steve Bracks seems to have weakened Labor's chance of picking up Deakin over the tollway issue, although it has been pointed out that the state Liberals would do exactly the same thing. One other matter about Deaking - it's the "moral middle-class" discussed in the first paragraph - confusing state and federal issues won't wash with them and they have a strong liberal Christian ethic in many parts of the seat. Keep on eye out on this one. Despite McMillan becoming a notional Liberal seat, the young Labor member Christian Zahra is both popular and a competent campaigner. With some hesitation I would suggest he will retain this seat. The only other places of interest is McEwen which is too close to call and the National's seat Gippsland which is under serious risk from Labor following the incorporation of substantial parts of the La Trobe valley - not to mention a significant move of Victorian diary farmers to the Labor fold over recent years.
So there you have it. At least 12 seats to go to Labor, enough to form a majority government, with the possibility of several more.
I have had a recent run-in with Telstra, over a disputed phone bill from two years ago where the account and the quite modest outstanding balance was transferred into another persons' name just prior to my move to East Timor. It came to a head when I attempted to transfer my old Parliament of Victoria mobile number to my name - and bumped into
ultraviolencia who works at a Telstra shop at the same time. I've submitted a complaint to the Telecommunications ombudsman over Telstra's intransigence on the matter and will be going to different providers for all my services. In general, it is clear to see why Lindsay Tanner's suggestion (I may add with significant prompting by myself) that Telstra be split into a private service provider and a public infrastructure maintenance body makes a great deal of sense. Their behaviour is that of an organization that thinks that they are still a monopoly, whereas the only reason that they retain any customers is because of their hold on infrastructure.In that other news which takes up 99% percent of my life - the two courses of full-time study, the one course of part-time study and my part-time work - all goes well. I am positively flying through the Cert in Business Management being the only person in a class of 37 to have handed in the three assesment tasks (15 haven't handed in any, 14 have handed in one, 7 have handed in two). I am now feeling quite confident with the CCNA, having tested myself on the first part of the exam and getting over 85% whilst literally falling asleep last Monday night. Business goes well with more new clients from the course seeking my attention and a hairdresser where old Perth friend microJames promises to splash a great deal of money in my direction. Editing on the PhD continues as usual.
Last weekend was mostly spent helping
severina_242 move into her spacious new flat in Elwood - the place that artists inevitably end up when successful in Melbourne. Seeming that she is now employed as a graphic artist it seems quite appropriate. Although time out was taken to attend the Unitarian's whose service fell under the old anarchist slogan "No Gods, No Masters" (very appropriate for the Unitarians, some would say), and the presentation on the introduction of Islamic law in Iraq, its re-establishment in Afghanistan, the force of non-secularists in the United States and the effect on these on women. When one hears about such things it is very easy to understand why people are (a) very cynical about claims of "freedom" and "liberation" when all that seems to occur is a gender-specific "liberation" for economic purposes and (b) why many women are not prone to be particularly supportive of patriachial religions in secular states. As if it wasn't obvious from many preceeding posts over the past twelve months, I have had a change in diet in the past month which is friendly to mammals. I am still chowing down on chicken and fish and marsupials are a bit of a grey area. I still reckon I would try grilled rat if I get to visit the countryside of southern Viet Nam. Nonetheless, by an large, mammals are off my main culinary activity.
And on a related note, I do have a brain-breaker of the week, which is a bit of an oldie, but a goodie.
pr0zac, being a zoologist, was about to attend a lecture on mice and mutant penises and was having a bit of giggle about the fun that zoologists have. In response I pointed her to the unusual penis of the Argentine Duck. Subsequently caseopaya and I discussed what happens to this poor duck. I mean, imagine if it doesn't retract. Whilst flying it would be mistaken for a kite's tail. When swimming a large fish might take a bite out of it. And landing and waddling would cause it to trip over its paddles. The mind boggles!Update (aka "How did I forget that?")
Gathering of the week was the thirtieth birthday bash at Polly's for
usekh. So many el-jay people there, great to see y'all, seeming how little I get out these days. Apologies for not being so bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, but I had been moving furniture all day. And that can be somewhat tiring...![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
election stuff.
Date: 2004-09-08 05:36 pm (UTC)I wish I was still living at my parents this elections, as I then could vote for Christian Zahra, unfortunately, or fortunately depending how one sees it I am now in the seat of Wills, which will unless the impossible occurs will stay labor.
What I need to know, can one get a full listing of who is running for the senate so one can do research before one votes, as I always prefer to vote below the line.
Regards
Benjamin
Re: election stuff.
Date: 2004-09-08 07:20 pm (UTC)Good lord. I'm always worried that I'd fill out a box incorrectly. And I think about the poor scrutineers who have to follow such things. Ugly.
I think below the line voting is part of the reason that the Democrats have suffered. I mean, does anyone know how they're splitting their Senate votes?
Re: election stuff.
Date: 2004-09-08 08:09 pm (UTC)I usually start with my top three, i.e. dems, greens, labor, then work from the bottom up...
B
Re: election stuff.
From:Re: election stuff.
From:Re: election stuff.
From:Re: election stuff.
Date: 2004-09-11 10:33 am (UTC)Besides, it gave me the great delight of placing Pauline Hanson dead last (#52, if I recall correctly), back when she went for a Senate seat here because there was trouble in Queensland. The same trouble which led to her time in jail.
I, of course, am also in Wills, so all those details apply to me too. :)
Re: election stuff.
Date: 2004-09-13 12:13 am (UTC)Good lord. I'm always worried that I'd fill out a box incorrectly. And I think about the poor scrutineers who have to follow such things. Ugly.
One of the few satisfactions of an election is the joy of listing your few favourites first and the schadenfreude of sorting out the ones you loathe most. If they don't meet at the middle, you've stuffed up and can easily ask for another paper.
The scrutineers? They deserve what they get ;-).
Oh, something you might be interested in... One of the pink flats is up for sale: here.
the duck
Date: 2004-09-08 05:42 pm (UTC)How? All those suggestions of 'why' are complete BS - they have no idea how it got there and I'm petty sure that that little black duck will no father ducklings since he's not sure how to use it! surely muscualr control would be an issue - after all, what other male has to lift an organ the size of his body in order to be able to find gratification? For any male that's too much like hard work :)) All he's left with is bragging rights at the pub!! *LOL*
Re: the duck
Date: 2004-09-08 07:18 pm (UTC)I think you're right about the duck. This surely is a mutation and any suggestion that - like a peacock's feathers - that it serves as some sort of enticement is clearly contraindicated by how dysfunctional such an organ is!
But at least it gets bragging rights at the pub...
Hey, I wonder what it tastes like?
Re: the duck
From:I made a mistake!
Date: 2004-09-08 05:44 pm (UTC)Not
Re: I made a mistake!
Date: 2004-09-08 05:57 pm (UTC)*shrug*
Benjamin
Re: I made a mistake!
From:Re: I made a mistake!
Date: 2004-09-08 06:05 pm (UTC)Re: I made a mistake!
From:Re: I made a mistake!
From:Re: I made a mistake!
From:Re: I made a mistake!
From:Re: I made a mistake!
From:Re: I made a mistake!
Date: 2004-09-09 09:47 pm (UTC)Re: I made a mistake!
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 06:57 pm (UTC)Multiple member proportional rep is my favoured system.
And with very low numbers of voters per seat. I don't think you truly have a democracy when your representative is trying access the wishes of 70,000 people...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:straight for the non political segment :)
Date: 2004-09-08 06:13 pm (UTC)Can I be standing next to you, holding up a photo of Harlequin and Monte??? *cheeky grin*
Re: straight for the non political segment :)
Date: 2004-09-08 06:59 pm (UTC)Sure. It wouldn't make any difference at all. Haven't you noticed how I occassionally look at Harlequin with saliva dripping from my lips? ;-)
Re: straight for the non political segment :)
From:Re: straight for the non political segment :)
From:Re: straight for the non political segment :)
From:Re: straight for the non political segment :)
From:Re: straight for the non political segment :)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 06:18 pm (UTC)Whilst is a word I need to feature more prominently in my vocabulary.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 07:06 pm (UTC)The main problem is that foreign affairs doesn't feature much in the mindset of swing voters. They're primarily worried about the hip-pocket nerve.
Australia is an isolated, Anglo-European country and despite the fact it is contrary to their best interests, too many people want it to stay that way. Such people are even nervous about too many refugees coming to Australia.
Imagine. Australia - about 20 million people and the size of Europe. Worried about extra people.
I've crossed the Nullabor many times by bus. Believe me we have a lot of space.
*shakes fist at stupid pariochialism*
no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 08:50 pm (UTC)Young James (heh, not so young now) seems very well and very happy. It looks like he's in a well paid stable job doing what he does well...
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 10:08 pm (UTC)Poor tactical move, because as long as Howard wins Bennelong this time the longer-term isn't likely to be much of an issue; in another three years, I suspect his time will be well and truly up.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-08 10:21 pm (UTC)Ahh, yes but it's not just Wilkie that's the factor against Howard in Bennelong. It's Wilkie plus a whole range of others. It's Labor plus Wilkie plus Vader plus Rollo.
In 2001 Howard picked up 53% of the primary vote (http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2004/guide/benn.htm). If the former President of the Liberal Party, Valder, can sheer off 15% and Rollo another 2-3%, Wilkie picks up 10%, the Democrats 5% and Labor 30% suddenly it gets very interesting.
The key element will be a big success by either Valder or Wilkie and Labor running third and directing preferences to either of the above.
now what...
Date: 2004-09-08 11:12 pm (UTC)*sigh*
B
Re: now what...
Date: 2004-09-08 11:39 pm (UTC)I reckon they'll be tight-lipped about it. After the lambasting received about trying to tie the Chechnyan terrorists with the election, this will taken in the political stride.
If Howard tries to milk this for political mileage I'd suggest that people would react negatively.
Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:Re: now what...
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 02:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 05:09 am (UTC)No problem. I'll tag ya back...
Hmmm.. You know Jay.. And what's this think Filmnet?
In St Kilda as well? Perhaps we should do coffee - I'm in Eildon Rd.
(no subject)
From: