Hazel's not dead on spooky Friday 13th...
Feb. 13th, 2004 01:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tcpipI've discovered that with some people if you're terse they listen to you. Thus the APJC have offered me more work and more money. I have convinced them that it is a really good idea to have fully compliant w3c xhtml and css code.
A similar situation has arisen with the journal 'New Politics'. Initially they wanted nothing to do with my Jim Cairns article. Then I tersely explained who the good Dr. Cairns was. Yesterday the board approved my article for publication and they want me to write more.
On another article writing activity, I've finished a draft response to Jared Israel's piece in The Emperor's New Clothes. To say the least, I think Mr. Israel is engaging in act of sublime deception when it comes to land distribution in the holy country. More on that later.
Superannuation is a funny ol' thing isn't it? First
Peter Costello and
Tony Abbot defend the generous politicians scheme. Then Johnnie Ho backs the gospel of St. Mark. Zey has pointed out this marvellous little article about Peter Costello and tax from crikey.com. Well worth a read.
It does raise an interesting question and one which has three extremes. Do you follow (a) the US system where some judges are paid so much that they are supposed to be "above bribery", (b) the Cuban system where politicians get the same as the average worker, or (c) Plato's system where they don't get paid at all, but rather have "the keys to the city".
Various LJ people have alerted me to the worst part of this trade deal. Australia gets lumped with that most protectionist standard of all -
US intellectual property law. Fortunately, the Senate may still be available to scuttle this aspect of it. I'll be bothering Electronic Frontiers Australia and Labor's Stephen Conroy over the next few days over getting a public campaign started.
My love-hate relationship with things French continues. The bill states that "in schools, junior high schools and high schools, signs and dress that conspicuously show the religious affiliation of students are forbidden." To restate my comments from damien_wise..
Which, apart from the oft-cited Muslim hijab, also means Jewish skull-caps, and Christian crucifixes. What it means for goths wearing crucifixes is uncertain, or Celtic pagans wearing knotwork pendants, Sikh turbans, "conspicious beards", hippies wearing t-shirts that say "J'adore la nature" etc etc..
The only result I can see of this is people - or rather parents signing up their children - en masse to religious schools. Great.
Twenty one years ago, at my old Catholic school, I engaged in a class debate where I furiously advocated that people should be able to wear whatever the damn well want to to school. I still hold to that principle.
I've always had a sense of kindness for little animals, be it from adopting stray cats in East Timor, feeding possums as a regular ritual or even providing sweet potato pancakes for rats. But in recent weeks I've gone even a little too anthropomorphic for my own good, watching The Secret of NIMH, Watership Down and enjoying both of them. I mean really, how old am I?
A similar situation has arisen with the journal 'New Politics'. Initially they wanted nothing to do with my Jim Cairns article. Then I tersely explained who the good Dr. Cairns was. Yesterday the board approved my article for publication and they want me to write more.
On another article writing activity, I've finished a draft response to Jared Israel's piece in The Emperor's New Clothes. To say the least, I think Mr. Israel is engaging in act of sublime deception when it comes to land distribution in the holy country. More on that later.
Superannuation is a funny ol' thing isn't it? First
Peter Costello and
Tony Abbot defend the generous politicians scheme. Then Johnnie Ho backs the gospel of St. Mark. Zey has pointed out this marvellous little article about Peter Costello and tax from crikey.com. Well worth a read.
It does raise an interesting question and one which has three extremes. Do you follow (a) the US system where some judges are paid so much that they are supposed to be "above bribery", (b) the Cuban system where politicians get the same as the average worker, or (c) Plato's system where they don't get paid at all, but rather have "the keys to the city".
Various LJ people have alerted me to the worst part of this trade deal. Australia gets lumped with that most protectionist standard of all -
US intellectual property law. Fortunately, the Senate may still be available to scuttle this aspect of it. I'll be bothering Electronic Frontiers Australia and Labor's Stephen Conroy over the next few days over getting a public campaign started.
My love-hate relationship with things French continues. The bill states that "in schools, junior high schools and high schools, signs and dress that conspicuously show the religious affiliation of students are forbidden." To restate my comments from damien_wise..
Which, apart from the oft-cited Muslim hijab, also means Jewish skull-caps, and Christian crucifixes. What it means for goths wearing crucifixes is uncertain, or Celtic pagans wearing knotwork pendants, Sikh turbans, "conspicious beards", hippies wearing t-shirts that say "J'adore la nature" etc etc..
The only result I can see of this is people - or rather parents signing up their children - en masse to religious schools. Great.
Twenty one years ago, at my old Catholic school, I engaged in a class debate where I furiously advocated that people should be able to wear whatever the damn well want to to school. I still hold to that principle.
I've always had a sense of kindness for little animals, be it from adopting stray cats in East Timor, feeding possums as a regular ritual or even providing sweet potato pancakes for rats. But in recent weeks I've gone even a little too anthropomorphic for my own good, watching The Secret of NIMH, Watership Down and enjoying both of them. I mean really, how old am I?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re:
Date: 2004-02-14 02:27 am (UTC)There is a real difference between child-like and childish. Child-like is to retain a sense of wonder with the world (such as one does - or should do - when learning a new language) and childish is being impatient, inconsiderate and a rampaging monster of the ego..
Re:
Date: 2004-02-14 04:31 am (UTC)Wonder who you could be referring to with that description of the rampaiging moster *cheeky grin*
Re:
Date: 2004-02-14 06:09 am (UTC)Noone in particular, but when I think about there are some individuals who certainly fit this bill... Some of which are harmless and useless and some of which are very powerful individuals indeed....