tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
Last Thursday sat the gruelling PRINCE2 Practioner exam; this Thursday have a Project Management exam, and the following Thursday, an Advanced Project Management exam, latter two more orientated towards PMBoK. The main difference between the two is that the former gives a highly structured process with organisations, whereas the latter provides a toolkit of techniques. Using both, simultaneously, is increasingly my recommendation. Very interested to see that the ISO is introducing project management systems.

Philosophy Forum meeting yesterday had yours truly presenting with the evocative title: "Mary, the Swampy Philosophical Zombie, Is In Your Chinese Room!", an outline of theories and models of consciousness, followed by problems with physicalist reductionalism, and finally with varieties of dualism. Personally, I sit somewhere between property and predicate dualism. There was an excellent turnout and very good discussion. I have also been fortunate to have engaged zombie-advocate David Chalmers in some discussion on the subject.

Date: 2012-06-04 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
I'm generally a functionalist when it comes to theories of consciousness.

I'm interested in getting some more formal knowledge about project management, but PRINCE2 seems unwieldy overkill for the smaller organisations I usually am involved with. Perhaps PMBoK might be worth a look?

Date: 2012-06-04 05:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com
I'm generally a functionalist when it comes to theories of consciousness.

Wow, I didn't know there was any left ;)

More seriously, one of the great insights of functionalism (and empirically tested) was multiple realisibility. Of course, this in itself does not provide sufficient account for linguistic mediation of consciousness, imo.

PRINCE2 seems unwieldy overkill for the smaller organisations I usually am involved with. Perhaps PMBoK might be worth a look?

As long as you stick the principles, you're doing PRINCE2. By tailoring it to your organisation you can combine many of the procedures (e.g., using standard documentation). PRINCE2 even allows you to skip some steps, as long as you note that in your risk register.

I wouldn't recommend PMBoK for small projects; I find it more useful for bigger PRINCE2 projects that require fine-tuning. For example, PRINCE2 says you should have a schedule, but doesn't give any techniques on how to generate one. PMBoK gives several.

Date: 2012-06-04 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
followed by problems with physicalist reductionalism,

By that, you mean, the model where the brain is seen as a computer and the minute you "turn off the power," there goes consciousness?

Date: 2012-06-04 05:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com
Physicalist reductionalism is the idea that all mental events can be reduced to brain states, which is somewhat different to what you're describing, which is that mental states are dependent on brain states.

The difference is in some forms of dualism, mental states are dependent on brain states, but cannot be reduced to them; this is called supervenience, or, from the other perspective, the mind is an emergent property of the brain.

Date: 2012-06-04 06:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jonathankorman.livejournal.com
If ever there was a paper with a title designed to make me read it, that is the one.

Date: 2012-06-04 09:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com
I must confess I did have a little fun with the title. There are of course, other that have also tried to jazz up what is normally formal inquiries. One of my favourites is Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments

Date: 2012-06-04 07:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffyblanket.livejournal.com
I'm still attracted to the nondualism of Schrödinger and Advaita Vedanta .

Date: 2012-06-04 09:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com
Whether you take a physicalist or idealist approach to monism, you will still have to able to reduce mental states to brain states. I don't think it is possible, for example, to explain concepts like "love" in terms of pure electro-chemical reactions, or even for that matter, the phenomenal experience of the colour "blue". I do think that such qualia depends on electro-chemical reactions, but is greater than the some of those parts - not the least because of the strong association of language I have with linguistic mediation. At least part of our experience of qualia, I believe, arises from a socialisation process - which means that even our thoughts are not entirely our own.

Date: 2012-06-04 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fluffyblanket.livejournal.com
"even our thoughts are not entirely our own."
With subliminal messages I´ve long suspected that !!!

Profile

tcpip: (Default)
Diary of a B+ Grade Polymath

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 56
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 12th, 2025 08:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios