Yes, but I'm FOR Transcendental Idealism, because, unlike Strawson, I don't see see it as metaphysical at all. In fact, my position is contrasted to Strawson and his followers on one side, and those who would have Kant be a rationalist on the other.
The really good, and clear book on this topic is Henry Allison's Kant's Transcendental Idealism, which originally was published in 1983, and a second edition, with some revisions came out in 2004.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-03-30 01:00 am (UTC)Yes, but I'm FOR Transcendental Idealism, because, unlike Strawson, I don't see see it as metaphysical at all. In fact, my position is contrasted to Strawson and his followers on one side, and those who would have Kant be a rationalist on the other.
The really good, and clear book on this topic is Henry Allison's Kant's Transcendental Idealism, which originally was published in 1983, and a second edition, with some revisions came out in 2004.