An isocracy avoids the common criticisms of democracy (e.g., tyranny of the majority) by limiting public governance to the public sphere and private governance to the private sphere.
So does, arguably, absolutely every single system of governance ever conceived, albeit entirely informally. Can we get some more meat on that paragraph at some point?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-02-15 12:54 am (UTC)An isocracy avoids the common criticisms of democracy (e.g., tyranny of the majority) by limiting public governance to the public sphere and private governance to the private sphere.
So does, arguably, absolutely every single system of governance ever conceived, albeit entirely informally. Can we get some more meat on that paragraph at some point?