Basically I disagree with the suggestion that the actions of the Bush presidency should be ignored in favour of a forward-looking agenda, because I disagree that the two are mutually exclusive.
Secondly, all works between signatories of the UN Charter are "illegal" under the agreements of that charter. The only body which can legally authorise military force between inter-state disputes is the UN Security Council.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-06-05 02:10 am (UTC)Basically I disagree with the suggestion that the actions of the Bush presidency should be ignored in favour of a forward-looking agenda, because I disagree that the two are mutually exclusive.
Secondly, all works between signatories of the UN Charter are "illegal" under the agreements of that charter. The only body which can legally authorise military force between inter-state disputes is the UN Security Council.