Date: 2008-05-19 03:25 pm (UTC)
The first would be for temporary monopolies on the production of ideas to the point that the investment is recompensed and then have the product open to the public.

Indeed, this seemed to be the original idea behind patents--before they were corrupted by the political process.

I'm not too crazy about the government getting involved in compensating people for their IP, of course (and not just for the reasons you mention), but I do agree that solutions exist. The biggest motivation would come from open competition in the market, but I think we're sadly past that for computer desktops. I also don't have much confidence in the technical acumen of the average computer user to properly secure their desktop systems, whether they're using Windows, Mac or Un*x. Once you introduce a layer of visual abstraction to improve usability, you open up countless possibilities for security compromises. And no amount of secure open-source software will prevent some idiots from writing their password on a sticky note and pasting it to their monitor. ;-)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

tcpip: (Default)
Diary of a B+ Grade Polymath

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 56
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 12th, 2025 01:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios