His attempt to reduce the debate of agnosticism down to a question of probabilities indicates that he doesn't even know what the word entails. It is ludicrous.
This said, I am very supportive of his words when we condemns the nonsense of theistic religions.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:32 am (UTC)His attempt to reduce the debate of agnosticism down to a question of probabilities indicates that he doesn't even know what the word entails. It is ludicrous.
This said, I am very supportive of his words when we condemns the nonsense of theistic religions.