Peer review in science is anything that "just opinion". The process of hypothesis making and hypothesis breaking is utterly savage in its rigour. When it comes to these field of inquiry, scientists are not nice people, and nor should they be. They are utterly amoral in the pursuit of truth.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-03 04:34 am (UTC)Peer review in science is anything that "just opinion". The process of hypothesis making and hypothesis breaking is utterly savage in its rigour. When it comes to these field of inquiry, scientists are not nice people, and nor should they be. They are utterly amoral in the pursuit of truth.