tcpip: (Default)
[personal profile] tcpip
Hmmm... Ten days since the last update. Main excitement since was building a new server for Borderlands, and recovering data as I went from a Domain to a Workgroup for the MS-Windows clients. This server, btw, will be running Red Hat Fedora Core 4 Linux, not bloody Windows NT 4.0.

MC-ed the True Cost Economics Forum at Swinburne University last week; some 75 people in attendence and some excellent speakers including Alanna Hartzok, Associate Professor Frank Fisher, and Kenneth Davidson.

The Federal Government's budget is a "miserable failure" and an "irresponsible scam" (quotes from my press release this afternoon). People earning less than $63000 pa will probably find themselves worse off when interest rate increases (oh, the irony) and transport costs are taken into account. The significant business and high income tax cuts have primarily come from China's strong demand for commodities which isn't exactly a long-term proposal. As recognised, the budget does nothing for the environment and fails to address the growing skills shortage.

Caught up with [livejournal.com profile] v3nu5 and company on her brief visit to Melbourne; wandered around Luna Park, had coffee and cake on Acland Street and ate at the wonderful Xanghai. Managed to get half way to Kiss Kiss Bang Bang before my nose, leaking like a faucet, lead me and [livejournal.com profile] caseopaya to turn tail and head home. Still was wonderful to meet someone whom I've known since 1998 and never actually met in real life.

My letter in The Age a couple of weeks ago on Dr. George Pell led to a response by someone who claimed that Jesus wasn't a Jew (they should read Matthew 5:17 and 15:4-7) and a far more sensible reply by a Rev. Dr. Bob Fraser. On that related note; I am giving a presentation at the Melbourne Unitarian Church on June 11 for "Liberal and Rationalist Prospects in Islam"

Date: 2006-05-15 10:33 am (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
Oh dear God. I saw "Jika Jika Community Centre" and nearly sporked my eyes out. So they actually exorcised the place then?

Date: 2006-05-15 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

No, no, no... The Jika Jika Community Centre is in Northcote.... (Not at all to be confused with the Jika Motor Inn or the Jika Jika High Security Unit in Pentridge).

As for the old hotel and former original location of St Luke's Anglican Church, it still stands in all its, ahh, glory..

Date: 2006-05-15 11:27 am (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
"The Jika Jika low security centre in North Fitzroy."

Date: 2006-05-15 12:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luciusmalfoy.livejournal.com
Every time I read your livejournal - and [livejournal.com profile] aphephobia's journal - I feel like the country is going to hell in a handbasket. I feel somewhat powerless.

Date: 2006-05-15 12:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-e-cat.livejournal.com
I prescribe a large amount of alcohol and a 'fuck it' attitude.

Date: 2006-05-15 12:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] splodgenoodles.livejournal.com
The "Jesus wasn't a Jew" link goes to a report on the Singapore elections.

I suppose they think he was C of E or something. Gah. You don't even need to check the Bible for that sort of stuff.

Date: 2006-05-15 01:41 pm (UTC)
redcountess: (Default)
From: [personal profile] redcountess
The problem with the good reverend's assertation that Christians only follow the gospels, is that many, including the evangelicals in the USA, follow the rest of the bible as well, alblleit selectively, viz Leviticus and homosexuality.

Date: 2006-05-15 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] strangedave.livejournal.com
Thats the Other Borderlands, of course, not the magazine

The main thing that bothers me about management of the economy is how much depends on a housing bubble, that is incredibly regressive.

Date: 2006-05-15 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

Of course, not the magazine. Which I must write an article for one day.

To describe it as a 'housing bubble' is quite accurate; the price of housing, or rather land, (where site rental is privately accumulated) will always include a speculative component. The real cost of building houses has actually fallen (by about 0.5%) since 1950.

It's interesting that economic crashes are preceeded by a "housing" boom.

Personally, I'm glad interest rates have gone up. Indeed, I want Paul Keating levels.

Date: 2006-05-15 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

With a complimentary cocktail upon entry!

Speaking of which there is yet another Jika Jika (from whom we used to received Xmas cards from)..

From this morning's Age:
http://www.theage.com.au/text/articles/2006/05/15/1147545263405.html

Date: 2006-05-15 10:03 pm (UTC)
ext_4268: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kremmen.livejournal.com
For better or worse, China's strong demand for commodities may be a fairly long-term proposal, depending on your definition of "long".

Also, while the government has squandered opportunities to do sensible things with the money (activities such as spending something heading towards $1B on helicopters that are all grounded because they are dangerous aren't exactly smart), those who oppose the government will always reject any changes to taxation. We used to have awful bracket creep. A few years back when the highest marginal tax rate cut in around $50k, we were getting close to having half the working tax payers on the top rate. More than half were into the second highest rate. Now the top rate will come in at $150k and the second highest at $75, which is a fantastic improvement for the vast majority of workers. If a tiny interest rate rise is going to mean that someone on $60k a year isn't vastly better off, they are borrowing _way_ beyond a sensible level.

Date: 2006-05-15 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com
For better or worse, China's strong demand for commodities may be a fairly long-term proposal, depending on your definition of "long".

You may be right there; although I doubt strongly whether the planet could afford such industrialisation.

If a tiny interest rate rise is going to mean that someone on $60k a year isn't vastly better off, they are borrowing _way_ beyond a sensible level.

How do you figure that? A person on $63,000 will receive little changes to their income tax (see below) a mere $500 relief due to the marginal increase of the 30% threshold from $21600 to $25000.

Current income tax rates
00000 - 06000 0%
06001 - 21600 15%
21601 - 63000 30%
63001 - 95000 42%
95000+ 47%


New income tax rates
000000 - 006000 0%
006001 - 025000 15%
025000 - 075000 30%
075001 - 150000 40%
150,000+ 45%

Date: 2006-05-15 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

Well, yes; this is a problem with all religious texts - that various adherents interpret selectively, and even when they don't they claim that some of it is metaphor or contextual and others aren't.

Date: 2006-05-15 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

Ahh, fixed. The link was supposed to be:

http://www.theage.com.au/text/articles/2006/05/07/1146940404696.html

The thing about the Singaporean elections was that the Worker's Party received a damn good vote in the seats it actually ran for. We may see a change there in a couple of election's time..

Date: 2006-05-15 10:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

As long as it's only "somewhat".

Little has been gained in this world from the benevolence of our rulers; every little right we have has been fought for.

It's always an uphill battle against vested interests.

Date: 2006-05-15 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

That would not bode well for the future of the kittens, would it Mr. Cat?

Date: 2006-05-15 10:46 pm (UTC)
ext_4268: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kremmen.livejournal.com
I must admit that I didn't realise the tax rates were already that good. The brackets have definitely been shifted well since I last looked into them.

Date: 2006-05-15 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

One thing which nearly all commentators are still surprised about is why can't we get a government that will index the brackets to CPI (or similar) and therefore avoid, once and for all, the problem of "bracket creep".

Date: 2006-05-15 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jahbulon.livejournal.com
How quickly people forget this.

Date: 2006-05-15 11:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jahbulon.livejournal.com
What is the justification for lowering the tax rate for the highest bracket? Are rich people just paying too much tax?

Date: 2006-05-15 11:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

What is the justification for lowering the tax rate for the highest bracket? Are rich people just paying too much tax?

Indeed, that is exactly what they have been saying. This is despite the fact that it is low and middle income earners who are paying effective high rates of taxation; as for the effective taxation rate for part-time workers/part-time unemployed! Well, that approaches 70% plus.

Date: 2006-05-16 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fryboy.livejournal.com
Heh I read the letter by Rev. Fraser without having seen your original letter. If I'd seen it I would have said out loud "hey! I know that guy!" ..but I hadn't..so I didn't.

Ah well.

Date: 2006-05-16 03:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zey.livejournal.com
I'd have thought the answer was utterly obvious: self interest ;-).

Date: 2006-05-16 03:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zey.livejournal.com
Personally, I can't see how they can justify taxing people living at subsistence levels. The TFT needs to be increased well beyond $6000 to something reasonable like $12000-$20000.

Date: 2006-05-16 04:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

Well, there has been effective changes to the low-income offset threshold which means that low income people don't pay tax on the first 10,000 rather than 7,500 which was the case in the previous financial year.

Date: 2006-05-16 04:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

If it moves; tax it!

(Personally, I prefer taxing things which don't move)

Date: 2006-05-19 03:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] v3nu5.livejournal.com
Hanging with the pair of you was super cool! Thank you so much for dinner, it was lovely xx Sad that you guys didn't make it to KKBB but it was great all the same!

Date: 2006-05-19 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

Glad to finally meet up with you in RL. Very lovely company at dinner too!

Oh, and thanks for all the job offers... Might even take one of them up!

Date: 2006-05-19 05:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] v3nu5.livejournal.com
If you do decide to apply, please send your CV and cover letter through me so that I get the referral bonus :)

Date: 2006-05-19 05:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com

Hey, that's a very good idea! Will do that for sure!

Profile

tcpip: (Default)
Diary of a B+ Grade Polymath

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 12:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios