![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
One of the ways that affirmation occurs for those who live by the keyboard is that your essays are read and then circulated. I've had two such experiences recently. The first was my letter to members and associates of the Australia China Friendship Society (ACFS) Victoria on the 75th anniversary of its founding of the People's Republic. Apart from the hundreds of people it is distributed to normally, local members and other state branches have also asked me if they could forward and republish. The second such experience occurred just today when a member of East Timor Women Australia (ETWA) asked if they could republish my review of the Tais Exhibition and Symposium, as it includes a combination of a capsule history, personal experiences, and a review of both events.
If this wasn't enough, I have received similar feedback in recent days from multiple sources concerning three HPC workshops that I ran the week previous which started from the Linux command-line and ended with profiling and debugging MPI code, which is quite a firehose to drink from in three days if you're starting as a newbie. Over the years I have become accustomed to receiving positive feedback from doctoral and post-doctoral researchers from these workshops. After all, when you have complex problems and big datasets being introduced to supercomputing opens your eyes to computational possibilities. However, when such remarks are made by professors and lecturers with years of experience in the HPC world you can be forgiven for thinking that you've done a fairly good job. Apropos, in a few weeks I will be giving a presentation at eResesearch Australasia with the snappy title "The Spartan HPC Story: From Small Scale Experimental to Top500 and Beyond". This is story of a brave little supercomputer that started on sticky-tape and elastic bands and now is one of the most powerful systems in the world.
The third related item is that I've started work on my doctoral studies in climatology and sustainability. Being just a couple of weeks in it is an orientation period where one is introduced to the Euclid University way of doing things, which includes using their preferred tools. Coming from an open-source world it never ceases to surprise me how products like Microsoft Word (for example) are the default; a lot of this of course is because educators themselves teach how to use a tool rather than the underlying principles of learning such tools and then cycle of ignorance continues. For the shell game that is referencing systems, the University prefers Chicago-style referencing with Zotero for tracking (at least that is open-source). In the future, I may get an exemption to use my preference, IEEE style, notable for being spartan in implementation and free from unconscious biases.
If this wasn't enough, I have received similar feedback in recent days from multiple sources concerning three HPC workshops that I ran the week previous which started from the Linux command-line and ended with profiling and debugging MPI code, which is quite a firehose to drink from in three days if you're starting as a newbie. Over the years I have become accustomed to receiving positive feedback from doctoral and post-doctoral researchers from these workshops. After all, when you have complex problems and big datasets being introduced to supercomputing opens your eyes to computational possibilities. However, when such remarks are made by professors and lecturers with years of experience in the HPC world you can be forgiven for thinking that you've done a fairly good job. Apropos, in a few weeks I will be giving a presentation at eResesearch Australasia with the snappy title "The Spartan HPC Story: From Small Scale Experimental to Top500 and Beyond". This is story of a brave little supercomputer that started on sticky-tape and elastic bands and now is one of the most powerful systems in the world.
The third related item is that I've started work on my doctoral studies in climatology and sustainability. Being just a couple of weeks in it is an orientation period where one is introduced to the Euclid University way of doing things, which includes using their preferred tools. Coming from an open-source world it never ceases to surprise me how products like Microsoft Word (for example) are the default; a lot of this of course is because educators themselves teach how to use a tool rather than the underlying principles of learning such tools and then cycle of ignorance continues. For the shell game that is referencing systems, the University prefers Chicago-style referencing with Zotero for tracking (at least that is open-source). In the future, I may get an exemption to use my preference, IEEE style, notable for being spartan in implementation and free from unconscious biases.
