![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Have neglected a journal entries as the past three days has been largely taken up with running the "boot camp" intensive course that I run through work for Linux, High Performance Computing, and MPI programming. It is impressive that many of the students start off with no experience with command-line Linux at all and by the third day they're working through the logic of parallel programming in C or Fortran. The feedback suggests that it may have something to do with my teaching style; I prefer to think that because the trainees are typically PhD-candidates or higher that they pick it up quickly. On topic, gave a presentation to The Philosophy Forum on Sunday on The Philosophy of Education, with possibly the largest turnout witnessed at said gathering. There was some good debate over the counter-intuitive proposition that learning styles are complete arse, and the debate of globalisation (multiculturalism, Internet, transnational economics) in economics - I tried to emphasise the point that there was no avoidance or turning back from this fundamental setting of education debates.
Each evening has also witnessed some interesting events. On Monday night was the 122nd Annual Henry George Dinner, held at the Royal Society premises with Saul Eslake as the speaker. He presented some rather sensible comments on the economic damage caused by negative gearing and the first home-owners scheme and so forth, and indicated his preference for site-based taxes over that on capital and labour - all common sense really. The following night was the Linux Users of Victoria Annual General Meeting which, true to tradition, was the smallest attendance for the year. My report emphasised the improvements in membership, meeting attendance, and finances but also raised the question of strategic choices for the organisation. A motion on disincorporation and merging with Linux Australia was lost on proxies. Initially, I must admit, I opposed the idea of disincorporation but in the very recent past have come to see that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The arguments against seemed to be more of emotional attachment, which of course is a legitimate issue, but it is not by sentimentality that organisations succeed.
The Federal election opinion polls continue to provide less than satisfactory results for the Labor Party. Some punters have tried to emphasise the point in a sweary and ranty, yet surprisingly spot-on comparison on the major issues. It is surprising of course that given the disparity in policy common-sense that Labor is coming in on Saturday in underdog status. What it does seem is that there is a mood of "things are good, let's have a change", which of course is just crazy reasoning; do you apply that to relationships, for example? Perhaps the weirdest is the continuing claim by the LNP that they will abolish the so-called carbon tax (which is already an ETS) and replace it a "Direct Action" scheme which will cost more and not achieve our emissions commitments. I just hope that somehow people decide not to be an idiot this coming Saturday.
Each evening has also witnessed some interesting events. On Monday night was the 122nd Annual Henry George Dinner, held at the Royal Society premises with Saul Eslake as the speaker. He presented some rather sensible comments on the economic damage caused by negative gearing and the first home-owners scheme and so forth, and indicated his preference for site-based taxes over that on capital and labour - all common sense really. The following night was the Linux Users of Victoria Annual General Meeting which, true to tradition, was the smallest attendance for the year. My report emphasised the improvements in membership, meeting attendance, and finances but also raised the question of strategic choices for the organisation. A motion on disincorporation and merging with Linux Australia was lost on proxies. Initially, I must admit, I opposed the idea of disincorporation but in the very recent past have come to see that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. The arguments against seemed to be more of emotional attachment, which of course is a legitimate issue, but it is not by sentimentality that organisations succeed.
The Federal election opinion polls continue to provide less than satisfactory results for the Labor Party. Some punters have tried to emphasise the point in a sweary and ranty, yet surprisingly spot-on comparison on the major issues. It is surprising of course that given the disparity in policy common-sense that Labor is coming in on Saturday in underdog status. What it does seem is that there is a mood of "things are good, let's have a change", which of course is just crazy reasoning; do you apply that to relationships, for example? Perhaps the weirdest is the continuing claim by the LNP that they will abolish the so-called carbon tax (which is already an ETS) and replace it a "Direct Action" scheme which will cost more and not achieve our emissions commitments. I just hope that somehow people decide not to be an idiot this coming Saturday.
