![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Recent opinion polls show Tony Abbot has a better-than-even chance of becoming Prime Minister. This possible requires some serious thought. If you are gay, you can absolutely forget about same-sex marriage rights. At least with Labor, all that's required is to get the matter tabled at cabinet and the vote will be won. His absolutely archiac and offensive attitudes towards women, climate change and indigenous people is infuriating.
He carries a dangerous attitude towards to industrial relations and his deep indifference and ignorance of economic matters. Abbot loved 'Workchoices', and will bring it back; especially targetting unfair dismissal laws, pay and conditions, and penalty rates. Opposing the economic stimulus package, which is considered among the best designed in the world, with excellent results, Abbott not only expressed opposition to it, but slept through the vote after a night on the sauce.
Absolutely reckless cuts are planned against nation-building IT and environmental infrastructure, in favour of handing back $10.5 billion of resource rents from our commonwealth, to mining companies; because Tony understands that billionaires are having tough times. Abbott's accounting has been slippery or stupid.
Update: Former Reserve Bank chief, Bernie Fraser, (hardly a radical) blasts the Coalition over their economic policies.
He carries a dangerous attitude towards to industrial relations and his deep indifference and ignorance of economic matters. Abbot loved 'Workchoices', and will bring it back; especially targetting unfair dismissal laws, pay and conditions, and penalty rates. Opposing the economic stimulus package, which is considered among the best designed in the world, with excellent results, Abbott not only expressed opposition to it, but slept through the vote after a night on the sauce.
Absolutely reckless cuts are planned against nation-building IT and environmental infrastructure, in favour of handing back $10.5 billion of resource rents from our commonwealth, to mining companies; because Tony understands that billionaires are having tough times. Abbott's accounting has been slippery or stupid.
[T]he Coalition asked the department the cost of giving the Productivity Commission an extra $4 million a year. Yesterday the department replied poker-faced that it would cost $4 million a year.. One can only echo the words of Craig Emerson; Australia has never had in the post-war era a more economically incompetent candidate for the prime ministership than Tony Abbott.
Update: Former Reserve Bank chief, Bernie Fraser, (hardly a radical) blasts the Coalition over their economic policies.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 02:22 am (UTC)Also this is a essentially a transfer payment; billions of dollars out of IT infrastructure, billions of dollars handed back to the mining companies.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 02:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 02:27 am (UTC)http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/abbotts-asylum-seeker-policy-is-out-of-its-mind/
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 02:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 03:52 am (UTC)I can certainly understand people wanting to give Labor a bit of a kick, but you know, after getting rid of workchoices, ratifying Kyoto, making a formal apology to indigenous people and getting us through the GFC unscathed, it hasn't been a bad three years.
(Heck, even the insulation programme wasn't as bad a people make out...)
The possibility of a Howard Mark II looms on the horizon. And it's not a pretty sight..
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 03:53 am (UTC)In business that's called 'vertical market integration'.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 03:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 04:13 am (UTC)Perhaps it was naive of me to think 2007 was a few steps forward, but I gotta say; if this election swings LibNats back into power, I don't know how we come back from that.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 04:36 am (UTC)My main disappointments with the government currently (apart from the stupid filter) are less about what they have done, and more about what they couldn't do because they got blocked by Tony & his ilk and the more raving looney minorities.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 04:36 am (UTC)Some countries with super-high population concentrations have better speeds than us, but that's inevitable.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 04:44 am (UTC)[[Citation Needed]]
Because some other people from U.S. disagree.
http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/treating-aussie-internet-users-like-a-bunch-of-dodos/
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 05:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 05:30 am (UTC)After going on and on and on, I'd still like to see him bang a boomerang.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 07:30 am (UTC)The polling has been pretty crazy the past couple of weeks, but I get the feeling that things are changing. People are beginning to focus on the extremely poor economic competence of the opposition leader and his ultra-conservative views.
Being politically partisan I was worried that Nelson or Turnbull might steal the middle ground in an election. In this case I am worried about the thuggish legislation this crusader will impose on others.
NBN (nature of), cost & benefit
Date: 2010-08-07 08:39 am (UTC)NBN costs about $10bln/year over 4 years investment to build. Considering it's nation wide, that'll be about the cheapest piece of infrastructure that's ever been built. It's an absolute bargain.
There are a few new tunnels and bridges in Brisbane that cost multiple billions each!
NBN is not primarily for the "lucky" people who live in the right suburbs of the major population centres, it's for everybody. It means people can live elsewhere and do high tech jobs, but it also means farmers are able to upload the videos of their cattle to sell. That's a real need now, a satellite downlink to the outback can't deliver that.
This e-road delivers something very very valuable, namely ability to make a living outside the major population centres - it affects lifestyle (for all of us), education, health, use of resources, and more.
Quite possibly the people who came up with it didn't even realise that ;-), but it's huge.
Then we can also look at other countries, many "3rd world" nations have faster, more reliable and cheaper Internet connectivity than we do. And I know, because I've had people in those countries as my colleagues and the connectivity/bandwidth is what enabled the jobs.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 09:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 09:50 am (UTC)In other instances I think greater clarity should have been expressed. For example the offer of a "market based solution" to carbon pricing leaves the door open to both the ETS (some of the Libs) or a carbon tax (Greens). I think by this stage it should be obvious that the Libs aren't going to play ball.
In other areas I think they have seriously misjudged where the political centre actually is; on same-sex marriage, the Internet filter, and the NSCP, the majority of the population is far to the left than what's being offered.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 10:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-07 11:54 am (UTC)I suppose there's an argument to be made that it makes more sense to define the 'actual centre' in terms of the number of people on either side, and I can see that being perhaps a more democratic notion of the centre, but it saddens me.
The Right seems to be very good at moving the Overton window in their favour, whereas the Left often seems to spend more time buying into these moves than countering them.