Enough! Already! (... and mythic diversions)
The Israeli invasion of Gaza continues, with the number of civilian deaths rising dramatically. Claims that Israel has been using cluster bombs and white phosphorus. Two UN schools are bombed killing forty, just after UN ambulances were hit killing paramedics. The definition of a 'terrorist' and a 'valid target'seems to get a bit rubbery according to the IDF. In contrast, Australian Jews denounce the invasion. A former Israeli soldier, and now Oxford professor, has come to some hard conclusions as a result of the invasion. Avaaz (a remarkably effective group) has a cease-fire petition, which I urge all to sign and pass on. Also, go vote for Prof. Juan Cole's 'blog Informed Comment as Best Middle East or Africa 'Blog.
I sometimes find myself drawn into this discussion and over the years have found myself increasingly in support of the "one (democratic, secular) state solution". The partition of Palestine was perhaps the worst early decision made by the United Nations and was not supported by any neighbouring state or by the former colonial power. Under such circumstances it is hardly surprising that there have been seemingly endless violence and wars as a consequence. Resolving the issue would involve ending the pseudo-soveriegnity (as Hannah Arendt put it) of a Jewish state in favour of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Apart from applying laws equally over what it is currently Israel and the occupied territories, it would involvd ending existing discriminatory institutions and laws (e.g., Knesset Election Law, the control of the Israel Land Administration by the Jewish National Fund, the Law of Return, Nationality Law etc) would have to be abolished in favour of secular alternatives. Of course, having such considered opinions does attract detractors; dear readers, I present you my own troll from Tel Aviv.
Have engaged in a few mythic diversions of late. Last Sunday's RuneQuest Prax game included defeating the witch-queen of disease and visiting a moment of the non-sequential reality that is the Godtime.
darknova666's character jumped between misfortune and elation on several occassions in the scenario. On a further Gloranthan theme I've introduced The Crimson Bat in my HeroQuest pbem. Have also extracted and modified the review of Pathfinder from the latest issue of RPG Review (issue #3 already has three articles, awesome!) to submit to RPG.net. On an oddly related topic, on Sunday week I'm presenting on "A Unitarian-Univeralist View of the Economic Crisis" - how's that related? Afterwards we're playing Credo: The Game of Duelling Dogmas, which is attracting some interest from members of the congregation.
I sometimes find myself drawn into this discussion and over the years have found myself increasingly in support of the "one (democratic, secular) state solution". The partition of Palestine was perhaps the worst early decision made by the United Nations and was not supported by any neighbouring state or by the former colonial power. Under such circumstances it is hardly surprising that there have been seemingly endless violence and wars as a consequence. Resolving the issue would involve ending the pseudo-soveriegnity (as Hannah Arendt put it) of a Jewish state in favour of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Apart from applying laws equally over what it is currently Israel and the occupied territories, it would involvd ending existing discriminatory institutions and laws (e.g., Knesset Election Law, the control of the Israel Land Administration by the Jewish National Fund, the Law of Return, Nationality Law etc) would have to be abolished in favour of secular alternatives. Of course, having such considered opinions does attract detractors; dear readers, I present you my own troll from Tel Aviv.
Have engaged in a few mythic diversions of late. Last Sunday's RuneQuest Prax game included defeating the witch-queen of disease and visiting a moment of the non-sequential reality that is the Godtime.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
The logic appears to be something along the lines of: If a man who belongs to a terrorist group takes shelter in a hospital, we must shell the hospital. It is his fault the wounded die, but the risk of leaving him alive to kill people is worth killing people!
I am also upset that I constantly have to preface discussions with: 'I don't believe Israelis should be being hurt and killed' as if the very fact that I can well comprehend why racial rages and general unfairness and poverty boils into rage implies I think it's just dandy folk are hurling home made rockets at the other side. No, seriously, I do not want Israelis of any sort, soldier or not, to be killed and maimed, but good God if someone said 'we'll permit you to survive in abject free poverty while your oppressors are privileged in jobs, security, and resources until you are forced to relinquish freedom for basic quality of life' than an armed resistance would seem terribly bloody logical to me. Not nice, not good, almost definitely murderous, but very, very logical.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Knowing what I know about the last two weeks, and reading just the subjects it was kinda interesting.
I got an invite to a presser with Israeli Army spokesperson Mark Redjhev (Goebbels would be proud of his spin, so I'm sad I can't spell his name). A pity I missed it, but I imagine it would have been controlled.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
if so would love you to add me
Kaja Malouf
(no subject)
no subject
Could they be anything else? What else could they be?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The Crimson Bat, at Iceland? Interesting... but unless you're running in a very divergent Glorantha, Broyan knows it can be beaten, because he's done it before. 1619, start of the siege of Whitewall.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
i only see it being sorted out as seperate states walled off but with routes to the other states if blocked off.
cant see it happening for a whie tho.
i doubt the current offensive will ducceeed except to help the current rulers in the coming elections.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Of course, I am deeply concerned by the present drama. A few good notes:
Ramattan News is a Pal - based independent news source with very good coverage of the war.
Donating to Christian Aid's Middle East Appeal Fund or signing letters can directly help Gazans.
Out of all the people I see blog about these issues, you are one of the most consistent, level-headed and humanist. Keep up the good work!
(no subject)
no subject
I think that the democratic secular nation is the only solution that might work, because then both groups will have access to jerusalem. Honestly, whichever side loses that place is going to believe they lost and that'll be the end of it. unless you can clone the city, there will be no peace with a 2 state solution, sadly.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It is to some extent irrelevant to Israel and the US whether Palestinians vote Hamas for the soup kitchens, the schools and for the charity work -- the collective multi-million dollar zakat, as it were, of the organisation -- or for its militant stance. It is only relevant to Israel and the US that Fatah is losing the gravity of power.
Indeed, that is the most significant tactical blunder of recent times, and I am inclined to think it is one of Fatah. I suppose I should include Marwan Barghouti's al-Mustaqbal under this umbrella. Once Fatah and Mr Barghouti had collectively lost the popular vote, they had little choice but to take part in that incharitable Palestinian parlour game, Toss The Other Side's Politicans Off A Rooftop, which Fatah played for many rounds with Hamas for no long-term gain whatsoever.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
They act like Israel has two options only. Kill 700 people or not act, as if many other paths are not possible.
It is disgusting to watch this unfold and have reasonable people not be disgusted by this. There is NO excuse for the extremity of this attack considering how WEAK and NON-THREATENING Hamas is. A group that has been only able to kill a dozen people with their rockets in EIGHT years is not that scary. A group that has not even been able to kill HALF A DOZEN SOLDIERS in these crisis is not that threatening.
It is appalling and the sons and daughters of the people who support Israel will grow up in 40 years and wonder why their parents turned a blind eye. Like every generation that follows, looks back in history with disgust, and does the exact same thing in the present
(no subject)
no subject
A pox on both their houses.
no subject
What horrifies me about the current conflict is all the innocents being killed. Subhuman religious loonies: they can kill each other as much as they like. In fact, dare I say, the more the merrier.
(no subject)
no subject
I know very little about the israel/palestine conflict. It does strike me that Israel is, to some extent, being suckered. Hamas' rocket firing (which, it is reasonable to believe, they would know would provoke a military response - it's hard to see what else it achieves) seems designed to provoke Israel into overreacting, killing (ad- or inad-vertently) Gazan civilians, which gives Hamas a fresh crop of matyrs and alienated recruits. Provoking a disproprotionate response from "the authorities" is a classic insurrectionist tactic.
The implication is that Hamas have decided that being a civil government is just too hard (understandable under the blockade conditions they face) and have decided to revert to being a pure guerilla/terrorist militia again, since if you want to supply good governance then provoking attacks on your citizens/subjects isn't very helpful.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)