![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Rodent News, Ethics
Naughty rat (the one with the white paws) passed away this afternoon. She was old and tired and rather over the heat, but also content with her lot. At 32.5 months of age, she comes in at roughly 81 human years. Friendly and gentle, she had been a good mother, underwent two tumour removals, and generally was good company to have around. We hope your time on this planet was comfortable and safe. Her parting leaves us with but four members of the order rodentia in our household; her children Picador and Pranskter, her cage-mate Lucky, and the visiting rat Suki. On-topic, I have received a brilliant reply to my request for cabybara milk (alas, in the negative). In other animal news, was delighted to discover a children's party on the estate this morning which included a large number of young rabbits and guinea pigs, a young sheep, and a kid goat. I think I was having more fun with their company than the children.
Adam Ford gave a presentation at The Philosophy Forum today on normative ethics, giving a broad overview of consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics. I must confess that I have always struggled intellectually with the latter, as I've considered it to be the result of deontological and consequentialist reasons, rather than an foundation. There is, of course, a good argument for virtue ethics as an intrinsic emotional point of view and in which case the argument for character building by habitual emulation of ethical leaders (Socrates, Jesus, Gautama Buddha, & etc) makes more sense. I raised the possibility that Nietzche was, in a sense, a virtue ethicist who was trying to build virtue by subjective overcoming - which of course concurs with my general assessment that he was very alone indeed in his mind.
Adam Ford gave a presentation at The Philosophy Forum today on normative ethics, giving a broad overview of consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics. I must confess that I have always struggled intellectually with the latter, as I've considered it to be the result of deontological and consequentialist reasons, rather than an foundation. There is, of course, a good argument for virtue ethics as an intrinsic emotional point of view and in which case the argument for character building by habitual emulation of ethical leaders (Socrates, Jesus, Gautama Buddha, & etc) makes more sense. I raised the possibility that Nietzche was, in a sense, a virtue ethicist who was trying to build virtue by subjective overcoming - which of course concurs with my general assessment that he was very alone indeed in his mind.
no subject
no subject