A Death in the Family, ARCS Video Collaboration Workshop, China and the Olympics
Just before we were about to head off to the second session of our fortnightly Call of Cthulhu game (Masks of Nyarlathotep, Horror on the Orient Express),
caseopaya received a 'phone call that her brother had died at home the night before at the rather young age of 49. Although the cause of death has not yet been determined, he suffered from type II diabetes and had a nasty foot infection; I am guessing blood poisoning and subsequent septic shock at this stage. I had only spent a few days with the 200cm, 120 kg ex-biker with a surly morning mood, but I found him quite likeable (after 9.30am). He was a genuine person of substance who appreciated the same and clearly cared a great deal for his little kid sister and the feeling was reciprocated;
caseopaya is currently making arrangement to go to Perth for the funeral.
Twice in the past fortnight I've had to attend the three-day ARCS Video Collaboration Workshop twice, once in Adelaide and once in Melbourne. Both went well, and I will never cease to be amazed by the endurance of Access Grid advocate Jason Bell who can, quite literally, talk for the better part of three days on the subject. For my own part, slides and notes of the presentation I gave are available. I've also put in a application to present to Linux Conf Australia where I'll try to summarise the three-day experience into a single session!
I readily admit upfront that I care little for the elite of competitive sports; I consider the real "medal count" of a country is the general level of activity and health, rather than how well a highly specialised select group performs. Australia may do very well in the Olympics, but when the average member of the population has questionable levels of fitness I think we are a failure rather than a success as a "sporting nation". This aside however, the media spotlight on China has been at least successful in uncovering how frightened this totalitarian dictatorship is of even modest criticism; spending $100 million USD on the opening ceremony where a sixth of the population lives on less than $2 USD per day is an obscenity. Whilst China itself has lost the media battle, in "free and democratic" Australia Channel 7 censored a Tibet advertisement; they (and some of their advertisers) will be receiving some terse correspondence from yours truly.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Twice in the past fortnight I've had to attend the three-day ARCS Video Collaboration Workshop twice, once in Adelaide and once in Melbourne. Both went well, and I will never cease to be amazed by the endurance of Access Grid advocate Jason Bell who can, quite literally, talk for the better part of three days on the subject. For my own part, slides and notes of the presentation I gave are available. I've also put in a application to present to Linux Conf Australia where I'll try to summarise the three-day experience into a single session!
I readily admit upfront that I care little for the elite of competitive sports; I consider the real "medal count" of a country is the general level of activity and health, rather than how well a highly specialised select group performs. Australia may do very well in the Olympics, but when the average member of the population has questionable levels of fitness I think we are a failure rather than a success as a "sporting nation". This aside however, the media spotlight on China has been at least successful in uncovering how frightened this totalitarian dictatorship is of even modest criticism; spending $100 million USD on the opening ceremony where a sixth of the population lives on less than $2 USD per day is an obscenity. Whilst China itself has lost the media battle, in "free and democratic" Australia Channel 7 censored a Tibet advertisement; they (and some of their advertisers) will be receiving some terse correspondence from yours truly.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
What do you have to say regarding the conditions of Tibet pre-Chinese hostile-takeover? What about the accusations of a theocratic dictatorship where the average citizen fared little better than the citizens of North Korea do now in terms of quality-of-life?
I'm not well-versed at all on the China/Tibet debate, and it seems like an issue where everyone falls on the side of Tibet, with the exception of a view voices whom you'd expect to deliberately be against the grain.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I read this post and was disappointed there were no references to Robin
(Remembering is an entirely separate issue).
Re: I read this post and was disappointed there were no references to Robin
Re: I read this post and was disappointed there were no references to Robin
Re: I read this post and was disappointed there were no references to Robin
no subject
On the other hand, I'm impressed by the athletes. America, too, battles the wave of epidemic obesity in our populations. That doesn't stop my awe at the beauty of a gymnasts routine or the spectacular performance of a diver. I could care less about the medals. Its about the athleticism for me. :-D
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
That's sad and tragic. Too young to die :(
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
That said, the ignorant view that many leftists have, that because this is a Chinese issue, they are somehow not imperial, or that Tibet shoudln't be freed, is really disgusting. I don't understand how people can be for Iragi, Palestinian and Ossetian freedom, yet oppose the same when it comes to China / Tibet. Pure hypocrisy.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I have not watched the olympics; I could not stand thinking about what all that money, spent by every participating group but especially China, could have done towards the welfare of its disadvantaged people.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)