ext_3181 ([identity profile] tcpip.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tcpip 2008-06-05 02:10 am (UTC)

OK, in response...

Basically I disagree with the suggestion that the actions of the Bush presidency should be ignored in favour of a forward-looking agenda, because I disagree that the two are mutually exclusive.

Secondly, all works between signatories of the UN Charter are "illegal" under the agreements of that charter. The only body which can legally authorise military force between inter-state disputes is the UN Security Council.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting