The problem with the ID advocates is that the don't have any testable propositions.
If you show them a dsyfunctional aspect of evolution which indicates there is no designer (e.g., koala pouches facing downwards) they will claim that there is a "hidden purpose" which we have not yet discovered.
no subject
The problem with the ID advocates is that the don't have any testable propositions.
If you show them a dsyfunctional aspect of evolution which indicates there is no designer (e.g., koala pouches facing downwards) they will claim that there is a "hidden purpose" which we have not yet discovered.