universal pragmatics attempts to construe utility in "metaphysical statements", not evaluate their meaningfulness.
This is not the case. Universal pragmatics engages in very precise definitions in what constitutes a meaningful and meaningless statement, along with what constitutes a rational, irrational and irrationalisable statement.
Re: Quibblings or quislings?
This is not the case. Universal pragmatics engages in very precise definitions in what constitutes a meaningful and meaningless statement, along with what constitutes a rational, irrational and irrationalisable statement.