![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Political Events and Queensland Visit
In the past several days I've had the opportunity to attend a few political events. The first was a rock-standard ALP branch meeting in Albert Park where there was a quality and respectful debate over advance medical directives for voluntary euthanasia. With some direct experience of this catch-22 loophole in existing legislation, it was good to see the motion passed with overwhelming support. The second event was hosted by The Australia Institute was Tasmanian Liberal MHR Bridget Archer speaking on integrity in politics; Archer is a leader of the handful of small-l liberals in that party and has crossed the floor for a national anti-corruption commission, for protecting transgender students, to support carbon emissions reduction legislation, and even and to censure former prime minister Scott Morrison over his secret appointment to other ministries. With several hundred people attending, I was satisfied with her qualified answer ("Yes, in principle, but the details are important") to my question on whether she would support "truth in political advertising" legislation, a matter that I have written about in the past.
The third event was an absolutely woeful presentation by the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence, Richard Marles with Pat Conroy, Minister for Defence Industry, defending the AUKUS agreement and the expenditure of an eye-watering $368bn, another matter that I have written about in the past. Unlike the Archer meeting where comments and questions were visible, these were prevented in the Marles-Conroy show, an old trick that allows one to be selective in their choices and prevent audience recognition of the depth of opposition. Marles' attempt to defend the expenditure as being "only" 0.7% of GDP per annum was deeply unconvincing as any analysis of opportunity costs would show, and Conroy's suggestion that these attack-class and fleet-support submarines are a deterrent in a global arms race was horrifical comical. If you want a deterrent you choose defensive weapons, not offensive weapons. These assault submarines are actually a major contribution to the arms race. Both offered the ludicrous bait that the project will provide 20,000 jobs - I'll leave it to others to calculate what good value for money 20,000 jobs are for a $368bn expenditure and perhaps to suggest alternatives.
The issue will, of course, be subject to some debate at the upcoming ALP National Conference in Brisbance this week, which I am attending as an observer, and thankfully there are those within the Party who recognise that this is a "mad, bad, and dangerous". At this stage, I suspect the "war faction" will get what they want for the time being, but this is far from over. In any case, I am looking forward to a few days in BrisVegas, as I haven't been for around a decade or so, and I have arranged a catch-up linner picnic with a few friends next Sunday after the conference in Roma Park.
The third event was an absolutely woeful presentation by the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence, Richard Marles with Pat Conroy, Minister for Defence Industry, defending the AUKUS agreement and the expenditure of an eye-watering $368bn, another matter that I have written about in the past. Unlike the Archer meeting where comments and questions were visible, these were prevented in the Marles-Conroy show, an old trick that allows one to be selective in their choices and prevent audience recognition of the depth of opposition. Marles' attempt to defend the expenditure as being "only" 0.7% of GDP per annum was deeply unconvincing as any analysis of opportunity costs would show, and Conroy's suggestion that these attack-class and fleet-support submarines are a deterrent in a global arms race was horrifical comical. If you want a deterrent you choose defensive weapons, not offensive weapons. These assault submarines are actually a major contribution to the arms race. Both offered the ludicrous bait that the project will provide 20,000 jobs - I'll leave it to others to calculate what good value for money 20,000 jobs are for a $368bn expenditure and perhaps to suggest alternatives.
The issue will, of course, be subject to some debate at the upcoming ALP National Conference in Brisbance this week, which I am attending as an observer, and thankfully there are those within the Party who recognise that this is a "mad, bad, and dangerous". At this stage, I suspect the "war faction" will get what they want for the time being, but this is far from over. In any case, I am looking forward to a few days in BrisVegas, as I haven't been for around a decade or so, and I have arranged a catch-up linner picnic with a few friends next Sunday after the conference in Roma Park.