ext_3181 (
tcpip.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
tcpip
2005-04-18 07:53 pm (UTC)
no subject
At least, I'm with Peter Garrett in saying the debate needs to be seriously opened and the conservation movement can't just flatly reject it any more.
I'm always up for debate on any issue.
The key problem will remain how do we ensure that commercial interests integrate with scientific facts and public liability.
First thing would be to get the execs to play with this:
http://www.ida.liu.se/~her/npp/demo.html
(
15 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
I'm always up for debate on any issue.
The key problem will remain how do we ensure that commercial interests integrate with scientific facts and public liability.
First thing would be to get the execs to play with this:
http://www.ida.liu.se/~her/npp/demo.html